[Xxx]

Hmm l wonder who did that l could guess

[Xxx]

iron insider wrote:

Thinking of stepping away from this cesspit but I will be back on D-DAY for my apologies. And there will be apologies.

See you you wont be missed a bit like me but im not going

[Xxx]

TheJuryeffsOut wrote:

Why would you worry that a some “haters” (whatever/whoever they are) would decide him to chuck it all in ? I’ve not heard any dissent at the matches, people even travelled to Dorking when we were already dead and buried and weeds growing on the grave.
If a few people on Twitter questioning his background are enough to make him give up then being a football club owner probably isn’t for him. From what I’ve seen this week at least a couple of Scunthorpe supporting twitter accounts that got involved have deleted themselves so obviously Twitter isn’t for them.
Spurs fans were chanting for Levy to get out of their club at Liverpool this afternoon and they have a fantastic team, stadium, near the top of the Premier League. I doubt Levy could give a tin shit what they think or be bothered to read their moaning on social media.
Deans planning for next season – good ! So am I, looking up where the feck Curzon, Chorley and Banbury are.

Well said to many people want the club or persons to fail even on this site l really don’t know why

[Xxx]

Ok mate you onow best

[Xxx]

cassidystash wrote:

Football forum = expression of opinions, not difficult to understand is it?

So what is yours

[Xxx]

Deereyme66 wrote:

‘I’m listening to the worst cockney commentator I’ve ever heard… Simply dreadful.’ Dean not managing today then?

Simple question why do you have to say that

[Xxx]

Iron-awe wrote:

Xxx wrote:

And after that

Don’t think Sidey will get dragged into another meaningless exchange mate like the other day. Just saying…..

Only a question is he your mate

[Xxx]

And after that

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

I am happy to give Hilton a chance, but I am not going to blindly agree with everything he does. He’s a football chairman, not a cult leader.

As for rumours, if they can be substantiated we should take heed. Much isn’t, which is the problem. Those making accusations need to be more wise or not spread malicious and damaging gossip (if untrue). However, if they are true, I won’t be following someone like that like a lemming.

Whats the alternative at the moment please tell

[Xxx]

So did l

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

If that has been the case, you have completely proven my point about sowing division among fans from yourself. Fortunately, I can move on and you overestimate your ability.

just keep moving and dont stop

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

Showing me up by lying. lol. I have maybe reacted longer than I should, but I am not the one attacking other fans, blaming them for potentially Hilton leaving and sowing division. I am not the one who has been shown to be lying to try and make out it’s me attacking fans for a different view. ;-)

Its been fun winding you up

[Xxx]

I never said a word

[Xxx]

Keep going im loving it stop showing yourself up

[Xxx]

Oh dear l guess you lost it

[Xxx]

Im not wriggling at all as i said before pot and kettle

[Xxx]

Soo you dont support hilton as i said

[Xxx]

You havnt

[Xxx]

Have read of your posts but you wont

[Xxx]

Pot and kettle my friend you cant have it always

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

Xxx wrote:

Siderite wrote:

WonderGoals wrote:

Awaywego, a lot of the crap he received on twitter was from newly created accounts and I don’t even think they were actually Scunny fans. Now whether they were trouble causing arse hole from Grimsby or disgruntled Bury fans I’m not sure but don’t think they were scunny fans.

I noticed as soon as Hilton went off twitter a lot of the accounts which were newly created all magically disappeared, never to be seen again.

All seemed a bit suspect. I smelt a rat or shall I say many rats but whoever they were completed their goal and caused unrest due to Hilton not frequenting twitter anymore so I hope they’re happy with themselves.

Many who forced him off were Bury fans, but that didn’t stop some from claiming it was Scunny fans. The same fans who bemoan negativity, yet love to sow division in the fanbase.

I suggest you look at your previous posts

Yes. Being critical of fans who deride other fans for not being pro-Hilton enough is the cause of division. I should call for unity by slamming fans for not being pro Hilton enough, like you. ;-)

Im not but negative people dont help but l think you really dont want help the cause

[Xxx]

I wonder

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

WonderGoals wrote:

Awaywego, a lot of the crap he received on twitter was from newly created accounts and I don’t even think they were actually Scunny fans. Now whether they were trouble causing arse hole from Grimsby or disgruntled Bury fans I’m not sure but don’t think they were scunny fans.

I noticed as soon as Hilton went off twitter a lot of the accounts which were newly created all magically disappeared, never to be seen again.

All seemed a bit suspect. I smelt a rat or shall I say many rats but whoever they were completed their goal and caused unrest due to Hilton not frequenting twitter anymore so I hope they’re happy with themselves.

Many who forced him off were Bury fans, but that didn’t stop some from claiming it was Scunny fans. The same fans who bemoan negativity, yet love to sow division in the fanbase.

I suggest you look at your previous posts

1 user thanked author for this post.

Interested Bystander

[Xxx]

Hmm l like it

[Xxx]

Ha ha so do l but you wish i didnt that will make you feel better

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

Why does it sodding matter whether I agree or disagree with his decisions? He is a football club owner, not the messiah. I disagree with a lot, but that doesn’t mean I think things can’t improve. Nor does fans disagreeing with him mean forcing or wanting him out.

Except it was apparently one fan in that incident. More do slag him off online, but that’s what we have to accept in a free country, so long as it doesn’t cross a line. Every club has that, so this doesn’t mean fans are at fault and you referred to this incident as a reason to cut losses. As did some others, and I was disagreeing with it.

He gave reasons. Others disagreed, as is our right. We aren’t obliged to agree with him. This is a football club, not the Hilton cult. If we disagree with his ideas, it’s not our fault.

Given the 1899 scheme is such a great idea, I trust you have forked out for it? Looking at the numbers who have, it’s poor. Unsurprising, given the worries of current ground ownership, but I am sure it’s the fault of 3000 fans for not paying, not Hilton for a poorly planned idea (as it stands).

So who are you then

[Xxx]

Oh dear

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

Some were speaking he should leave because of this one incident, which was just one idiot. Of course people slag him off online. This is the same for every club in the country. Often more so for clubs with bigger fanbases. Is it right? No, but it’s a free country and, as long as it doesn’t get too personal, it cannot be silenced. Such is freedom of speech.

So you want him out then

[Xxx]

Only one person you must be blind to many slagging him off like it or not

1 user thanked author for this post.

Awaywego

[Xxx]

Siderite wrote:

One idiotic fan has probably yelled something at Hilton, and this has supposedly made him get cold feet and want out? And we’re expected to believe this would be the actions of an owner who has a lot of interest in the club? Give me a break.

This is not my actual opinion of him, because this hasn’t happened. However, it would be my opinion if this did happen.

So do you want him to fail just asking

[Author]

Posts