Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Regarding the questioning, do you think it possible that, prior to broadcast, the boys went through the questions they had ready and Mr Swann selected the questions they could ask and to which he could give a vague non-answer?
That’s what I was thinking but I’m back to what I said before, if that is indeed the case and you can’t ask the questions that really need answering….what is the real point of it ?
1 user thanked author for this post.
No excuse whatsoever to not play
O’Malley Taft Onariase/Mcgahey Clarke
Eisa Beestin Karcan Gillead
Loft and Green
Look, loft and Green are hardly ideal but why would anybody with even half a braincell throw everything else out the window just because Green is up there with Loft instead of a proper established striker ?
We do have quality here, especially Gillead and Eisa out wide but they’re being played in such a way that they’re completely stifled.
O’Malley is a quality attacking LB, he even ended up getting dropped for Brown. I don’t know what’s going off down at GP but it’s nonsensical whatever it is.
Why the hell doesn’t Cox just think to himself that his way clearly isn’t working and just go 4/4/2 with 2 upfront ?
It can’t be that hard to come to that conclusion, surely ?
Get Dales back involved far another option on the right hand side and least try and win games of football.
Cox was getting somewhere with 4/4/2 but understandably changed it when Mcgahey, Onariase, Brown and Van Veen were injured but least we have better defenders available again.
If anybody reads this from the club….please get on your hands and knees and tell Cox to show even an ounce of positivity and field a proper side with the intention of actually winning the game.
not sure why people are getting worked up about the questions asked.
I wouldn’t say more worked up, more disappointed. If you’re not sure why people were disappointed at the questions asked, then I give up.
It’s almost like Matt and co were shit scared to ask anything too challenging. All that get’s me is, Matt has a lot to say on twitter venting his disappointment like the rest of us and then has him on a live forum and his arse virtually drops out.
I bet they’re told by Swann or have an inkling if they push him even a little bit by asking questions then it will be the end of it, which begs the question if that’s the case “which is appears to be”…..what’s the point in it all if you feel you’re unable to ask the questions which needs answering ?
I mean if you’re too scared to ask the questions that need answering, not sure what purpose it serves.
People went out their way to send questions in, some of which were fantastic but again, if you daren’t ask the questions in case Swann throws a massive tantrum…is it worth peoples time ?
1 user thanked author for this post.
If they completely ripped Swann apart for 2 hours we probably wouldn’t hear from him again
Look, I appreciate all Matt does, he does a sterling job. I’ve already said so. Nobody wanted them to rip into him for 2 hours but he could have been given a much tougher examination.
I wouldn’t want anybody to have a a verbal battle with him, all I wanted was tough questions to be asked.
There were some sterling pressing questions sent in…one’s people really need answering but nothing really got put to him.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Complete and utter waste of time.
Blamed covid for nearly everything and used politician speel to explain the few more difficult questions he got put to him…resulting in him speaking a lot but not really saying anything.
I wanted Turan and Jarvis records read out to him and asked why if the records were so bad, why did we choose sign them on 2 yr contracts ?
Those are the kind of questions I want answering. I want to know who makes up this so called transfer committee and whether it’s going to be scrapped, now that another raft of poor players have been signed.
That needs asking.
Mr Swann got very, very easy ride there.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The hosts don’t help matters. I appreciate all the hard work Matt puts in with this site and the twitter page but he and the others could have made it a bit more challenging for him.
Some of those questions sent in were cracking….non got asked though. Time is an issue but even still, ask a few of the difficult one’s.
That’s the last one I’m wasting my time listening to.
Damp squib.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I’ve noticed the hosts didn’t even ask one of those hard questions which were sent in. All very nicey, nicey.
If even some of the hard questions don’t get put to him, why do we even get asked to sent them in, in the first place ?
All a waste of time.
1 user thanked author for this post.
