Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Looking at both sides of the argument. #261617
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Even confirmation bias. 😜

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Looking at both sides of the argument. #261616
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    No comments?

    Haven’t watched them, I prefer to search for my own ‘confirmatuin bias’ videos. 🤓

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Comedy Unleashed! #261506
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Pro-life, what type of pro-life deity would kill every man, woman, and child on Earth bar eight? Answers in a fictional book.

    in reply to: Fox News Settles Out Of Court #261169
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Still managed more social progress than Saint Jeremy in that he could win over the public, despite his very real flaws. This does include his PR courting of Murdoch. He is no great, and there won’t be any cultish chants of “oh Tony Blair” in the same way as there was with Corbyn.

    Fansy would probably welcome back Corbyn tomorrow. Perpetual opposition seems to be their preferred option.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Budweiser controversy #259864
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    As a Christian I love to check in to the Bru to sharpen my theological insights alongside the experts. I’d stick to footie and political wrangling if I were you boys.

    No comment though on how two faced Christianity is, old chap. Perhaps a good thing as as I’d hate to trawl through multi paragraphs that actually say very little. All aboard the Ark, and sod those left behind. :-)

    in reply to: Budweiser controversy #259809
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Rebellion against the “God breathed” words in the Holy Bible only leads to chaos and misery.

    Thou shalt not kill, all aboard the Ark, not you though.

    I presume the Unicorn’s must have sinned TW, if you’ve sinned your outta here.

    Turn the other cheek, an eye for an eye. Which God breathed words to follow or rebel against?

    in reply to: Budweiser controversy #259564
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Rebellion against the “God breathed” words in the Holy Bible only leads to chaos and misery.

    Thou shalt not kill, all aboard the Ark, not you though.

    in reply to: Record non-league attendance? #257881
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Pah, half a point. Just googled it and it is Wigan, but 27,526 in 1953. Tomorrow’s crowd is still good going, enjoy the day. 👍

    in reply to: Record non-league attendance? #257880
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Not cheated but I know it’s Wigan, sure it’s somewhere around the 37,000 mark. Heaven know how they packed so many many into that dump!

    in reply to: Season tickets #257838
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    it does leave you exposed with a season ticket if the club goes bust and you didn’t pay by credit card

    Up to this season Hull had the membership scheme where you had to pay monthly by direct debit for a season pass, even though they called it a membership scheme. This season they gave ‘members’ the choice to pay in cash in full for the full season. I coughed up straight away as I always used to pay for a season pass in full. Personal choice as I like to budget that way.

    in reply to: Wealdstone #257639
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    That was some goal by Leake, he’ll do well to score a better one in his career. 🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wealdstone #257556
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    AWG is going to give them some. ;-)

    in reply to: Will we hear from Swann again? #257395
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Abridged version,
    Scunthorpe’s demise, nowt to do with me or my talented offspring.⚽🐎💩

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Match of the Day… #257215
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    MOTD viewing figures were bound to rise due to curiosity as to how they were going to show the highlights. I expect they may be even higher this Saturday to see what Lineker’s opening words are.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Unborn baby killed. #257082
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    I’m just wondering why BPG didn’t raise the issue of the unborn babies killed in the Turkish/Syrian earthquake or by Russian missile attacks in Ukraine?

    God works in mysterious ways, much like your keyboard.

    in reply to: Unborn baby killed. #256993
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    BBC have reported an unborn baby has been killed ( murdered) in the tragedy at the Jehovah’s Witness location in Germany today.

    Not to worry, the nutter that did it can repent, spend a little time in purgatory and then enter heaven.

    in reply to: Winterton iron #256992
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Talking of non football, their flag seems to cross over into politics, I do hope they don’t take it to games. (Photo on scunny fans Facebook)

    Image required please, I don’t do faecesbook.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256873
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Your posts don’t change Buck’s are you now a usual suspect 🤔

    As ever, he’s a usual superciliousness. 😜

    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256872
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Just an interesting point, how long is “eternity?” 🤔

    90 minutes, many a Saturday afternoon. 🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256846
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Disappointed in you, ‘toe the line’. 🙂

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256787
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256786
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    pps TW posted as I was writing. A good 4th I think.

    Much obliged. 🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The big problem with Hell #256778
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    The big problem with Hell is it doesn’t exist.

    Indeed, not since the Vetch Field wàs demolished.

    in reply to: Annoying people top 3 no Politics or explanation #256714
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Tony Blackburn
    Tom Allen
    Dan Wooton

    in reply to: Credit to Sunak #256356
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    You couldn’t make it up.

    Not quite what I said to Mrs Two when I heard him saying that.

    in reply to: Oliver the conspiracy theorist #255355
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    I’ve watched him now and again on Little Britain News, an absolute nut job with all the questions, but never any answer.

    in reply to: Non-football trivia thread #254805
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Churchill
    Eden
    MacMillan
    Douglas-Home
    Wilson
    Heath
    Callaghan
    Thatcher
    Major
    Blair
    Brown
    Cameron
    May
    Johnson
    Truss

    15

    Although I’d reckon Thatcher thought the Queen served under her!

    Point of order, Johnson served himself.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Tax paid #254500
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Well it is the modern way Cliff, and scunny do lead the way in the world on Twitter posts, not for me though bit of a dinosaur did Bru for 2years before finding out it was social media.

    New rules on Bru coming next week, one is that those who registered less than six years ago will be banned. ;-)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Another day another dirty Tory #254031
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    TW just comes out with the usual “you think you’re superior” accurate comment.

    in reply to: Another day another dirty Tory #253935
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Siderite, quite why you have to come out with some quasi-intellectual rant about “whataboutery” is beyond me (as for “whataboutery” being a “known logical fallacy”, really? Which ‘expert’ came up with that one? No doubt you’ll enlighten us. I can hardly wait to find out).

    The reason I said you’re missing the point was/is because you are (still) missing it. I really have no idea what part of “I’m certainly not defending him” do you don’t/can’t/won’t understand.

    I’d also say you have to be pretty daft to interpret “I’m certainly not defending him” as being a deflection; and you’d have to be even more daft to interpret it as a “defence”.

    As for chirruping like a budgie, as I’ve said on many occasions I can live with Starmer. The key thing was to get Corbyn and his Communist mates out of the way.

    Usual superciliousness. 🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.