Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: U turn on a U turn. #266627
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Just in case any of you need it explaining.
    Today, Hilton (or one of his lackies) sent an email with an attachment to all the young lads in the academy informing them that he was closing the academy and they were no longer part of Scunthorpe United.
    He didn’t even have the bollocks to do it to their faces the spineless, horrible excuse for a man.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266599
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    For balance: you are omitting Hilton’s claim on the ransom strip, the land valuation difference, the planning permission expiration and alleged farmers access issues.

    I didn’t purposely omit them.
    Could you expand on the three points please?
    The three points that Hilton says exist but only he knows about, the planning permission was granted years ago but has now expired because the work wasn’t started, the ransom strip that nobody has ever proved the existence of, the farmers access that no farmer has ever claimed, it didn’t stop the planning permission for housing years ago so why should it now?
    As for the land valuation, Hilton agreed on the price.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Ilkeston #266594
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    The problem is Patrick,99% or more Scunthorpe fans are genuine guys,as you say.
    Unfortunately the less than 1% are a substantial number on this site.
    The majority of fans I speak to,and I ask,do you go on Iron Bru,they look at me with a blank stare,thankfully.

    Two things.
    Firstly, you are stating that a substantial number on this site are not “genuine guys” which would explain Two, the majority of fans you speak to look at you with a blank stare.
    You speak for yourself, you certainly do not speak for the majority of members of this site you foolish man.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266592
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Let’s put this deal between the two egotists into perspective.
    Please correct me if I’ve misunderstood what’s been happening.
    The deal to buy GP and the surrounding land.
    Hilton agreed to a deal for the full asking price in January and Swann accepted that offer giving him 4 months to complete the “legals”.
    Hilton waited those 4 months without doing so and then used a “loophole” that his solicitor allegedly found enabling Hilton to squat at the stadium whilst paying the land owner nothing.
    Does that come across as the actions of an honest and astute businessman that should be allowed to be the custodian of a community asset such as a professional football club?
    A further 2 months later (now 6 months on from agreeing a deal) “legals” have either not been completed or not started, I assume Hilton has been paying these lawyers for their time.
    Swann, none of us can possibly forget or ever forgive him for his shambolic tenure at our club, he has a lot to answer for.
    He turned what was once described as the best run small club in England to the absolute car crash on the brink of extinction that we are now witnessing.
    Hilton, comes across as a spiv type wide boy looking for “loopholes” to avoid paying for a deal he agreed to 6 months ago and has so far despite claiming he has the funds, has not honoured the deal.
    I never trusted Swann and I don’t trust Hilton.

    7 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266589
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Out of all the articles from different “experts” released in recent days this one appears the most concise and informative.
    Different people will read it and form different views.
    My take on it is that Hilton doesn’t and never had the funds to complete the sale, he changed the goalposts and came up with stalling tactics as the deadline approached.
    I suspect his plan from the beginning was to raise the funds via his rushed and ill thought out 1899 scheme that failed spectacularly, I’m baffled that he thought any other outcome was a possibility.

    He claims Swann must wait for the “legals”to be completed and they may take 3 to 6 months, 6 months have already lapsed since he claimed he’d bought the club, why haven’t the “legals” already been completed?
    I suspect it’s just another stalling tactic.
    As for his claim of moving into a new stadium in another 22 months, that is never going to happen and anybody who believes that is as daft as the man who made the claim.
    No planning permission has even been applied for never mind granted on land Hilton doesn’t and I very much doubt ever will own.

    I’m not sure if he does or doesn’t have the money, but if you read the article fully, Swann wants the 1.5 million pounds before dealing with the legal issues highlighted in the article. No one in the right mind would ever put that money forward.

    To put that into context it’s like you paying half of the house you’re buying off, before even owning it. It just wouldn’t happen.

    I’m certainly no financial expert but I do have an ability to read and understand English.
    I suggest you read the article again, come back to me and point out where it says “ Swann wants the 1.5 million pounds before dealing with the legal issues”.
    I’ll wait!

    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266573
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    I’m in no position to accuse Begbies Traynor of anything Les, they are respected experts in their field.
    If Hilton had the funds he claims from the beginning then why did he not pay the asking price then, he’s offering to now along with £10000 a month while it completes, he could’ve saved himself £60000 in the last 6 months?
    None of this makes sense to the experts who clearly say so in the article over the past days, so how is it supposed to make sense to us supporters who have no legal knowledge?

    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266567
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Out of all the articles from different “experts” released in recent days this one appears the most concise and informative.
    Different people will read it and form different views.
    My take on it is that Hilton doesn’t and never had the funds to complete the sale, he changed the goalposts and came up with stalling tactics as the deadline approached.
    I suspect his plan from the beginning was to raise the funds via his rushed and ill thought out 1899 scheme that failed spectacularly, I’m baffled that he thought any other outcome was a possibility.

    He claims Swann must wait for the “legals”to be completed and they may take 3 to 6 months, 6 months have already lapsed since he claimed he’d bought the club, why haven’t the “legals” already been completed?
    I suspect it’s just another stalling tactic.
    As for his claim of moving into a new stadium in another 22 months, that is never going to happen and anybody who believes that is as daft as the man who made the claim.
    No planning permission has even been applied for never mind granted on land Hilton doesn’t and I very much doubt ever will own.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Aidam McCartney’s piece #266541
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Hilton’s paperwork and this article suggest he is willing to pay 10k a month rent for GP.

    Yet at the fans forum he’s on record as saying he would pay 20k a month .

    Maybe a small detail but a 50% drop seems quite a lot .

    He said many things at the fans forum.
    None of them have come to fruition.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Ian King in depth article. #266489
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Neither of the them come out of the article very well.
    I suspect Hilton will be fuming when and if he reads it, the finger is firmly pointed at him.
    I’m surprised Property funding 2’s loan against Glanford park wasn’t mentioned.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    This could be trouble l dont suppose anyone knows how long it takes from filling to hearing

    Aiden Macartney is stating on Twitter it will be heard within a month.
    Unfortunately I only see one outcome unless these two can find an intermediary to bang their heads together and come to an agreement that allows us to play at Glanford park.
    Ilkeston anybody?

    in reply to: Toffolo #266434
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Hardly surprising as our ex chairman had a major problem in that department.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Which court?

    Looking at the case number, I assume it’s Leeds.

    in reply to: SACK JIMMY DEAN #266391
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Lol, ‘Liebour’! Yes, pretty sure it’s him. Bizarrely, I’ve realised I actually spent quite a bit of time with him when I was younger. How mad is that! I won’t say more. Respect his privacy and all that.

    I assume you mean the guy with a Christian name that’s fairly common in Iron Bru circles?

    in reply to: SACK JIMMY DEAN #266381
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Upon checking it appears Dean has been in sole charge of 19 games, winning only 3.
    15% win rate, that could be among the worst return for any of our managers.
    The argument that last season wasn’t his team holds no water as the club signed an unbelievable amount of players after his arrival.
    There’s a pattern and the pattern suggests the manager is not only not capable of stringing a sentence together without the words “erm” and “ya know” every 3 seconds, it appears he has no tactical nouse or control over his players.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SACK JIMMY DEAN #266377
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Now we know it’s serious.
    Even the happy clappers on the faceache forum have started to turn on him.
    Somebody remind me, since he’s been here, how many games has he been in charge of and how many wins can he claim?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: DH chat #266340
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    I hope he isn’t invited on here with us “vermin”!

    in reply to: David white #266288
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Here ya go Cassidy.

    David White
    Hold the new owner to account for what exactly????!
    Putting in his money?
    Giving up all his time???
    Sacrificing his other business?
    Sacrificing his family??
    I’ve said it time and time again and if you need me to keep pointing it out that your former owner is a liar then there is something wrong.
    You have all asked for me to interact but when I do I shouldn’t be doing it directly on social media.
    I shouldn’t be responding to absolute lies from a man that was two weeks away from killing your club and seemingly quite excited to do so. A man that took away your stadium that the club had owned since it was built in order to satisfy debts at Coolsilk that he had amassed due to mismanagement at the club. Whilst at the time issuing a press release to you all that the club had a 99 year lease and it was protected.
    He has now threatened to take legal action against the league because I have managed even with his games to keep the club playing football, he’s suing me and the club and a bookmaker and god only knows who else because everything is always somebody else’s fault.
    He has waited to take his action regarding the stadium and still does until such time he feels it will have the biggest impact on the club, right before matches. He puts out a statement on the eve of our first game calling out fans and players insinuating they’ve been duped trying to cause unrest. None of it will work.
    I will be speaking to Matt at Iron bru today, i have recently given Aidan McCartney some considerable time and i am prepared to give you at the trust the same, its the one thing i do agree with, unity will inspire success.
    Please note that in his statement he referred to numerous interested parties being ignored due to proof of fund issues. Showing that there was a clear process in place looking at such matters. My offer was accepted after providing proof of funds and I have spent far in excess he said I would have to since the takeover.
    I have attached below the evidence I offered proof of funds to his lawyer on April 24th at the point he tried to use this as an excuse. It’s quite common in land transactions to pass this evidence on to legal representation or agents. Mr Swann insisted my personal information ended up on his own desk which is never going to happen. If he has lawyers and agents he doesn’t trust despite being far better qualified than him to judge anything then that is his problem. In 20 years and 100 land transactions I’ve never asked my lawyers to forward personal documentation provided by a purchaser.
    I’ve also attached the offer made AGAIN last week which is everything he wanted and more. Just to evidence to you all he has no intention of selling the stadium to us he only wants your club to die. We await a response, but given the fact it’s a straightforward offer for the full amount and not the discounted amounts he offered in desperation to swerve the legal work, we had expected a straightforward acceptance.
    But please do not issue posts comparing me or my actions to his, and do not insinuate that i owe anybody anything. To date, i have already done far more than anybody else was prepared to in order to keep your club alive.
    Please show me more respect than that.
    Im pretty certain ive earned it.

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SUFC Acocunts Overdue #266267
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    I’m no businessman but from what Kieran Maguire who’s an expert in football finance we should be extremely concerned.
    The accounts show that Swann was pumping in £2 million a year of his own money to keep the club going until he pulled the plug.
    Seeing has Hilton obviously doesn’t have access to that amount of his own finance, if he had he wouldn’t be intimating he will finance it through loans surely, or perhaps that’s the way businessman operate now.

    I only see one outcome, unfortunately it’s the one none of us want.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SUFC Acocunts Overdue #266253
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Pleased to hear Hilton’s accountant has got over Covid.

    in reply to: Solidarity with Bru #266225
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Hilton appears to have singled out the owner of this forum, this is unacceptable.
    For a man claiming to be wealthy and claiming to be seen as the saviour of a football club he’s going the wrong way about it.
    Ranting and name calling on social media, not distancing themselves from burner accounts making death threats on social media is not the way a businessman should behave.
    The death threats should be investigated by the authorities, I would be surprised if that’s not already being looked in to.

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Items of interest… #266222
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    From a couple of minutes in.

    in reply to: Solidarity with Bru #266200
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    As I stated in my post the Trust should stay well clear of the boardroom, so the answer is nobody.
    I don’t believe supporters should be in the boardroom of a football club, in recent years we’ve had two, both were a disaster and in my opinion for what it’s worth they had to work alongside an egomaniac so they were on a loser from the day they appeared on companies house.
    Neither of the two should be allowed anywhere near the boardroom again, even though the Happy Clappers would seemingly want one of them to.

    in reply to: Solidarity with Bru #266197
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    We should be looking at getting Tony as the fan representative on the board, obviously if he’d want to and being allowed to being a councilor.

    Absolutely not!
    You must have a short memory, have you forgotten the last clown that was given a position as a “fan elected director”?
    Never elected and never represented the fans, strutted around Glanford Park as if he owned the place and went missing when the fans needed him as their voice.
    The trust should stay away from the boardroom.

    in reply to: Solidarity with Bru #266170
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Absolute bollocks, Hilton was and is more than happy to pay the original asking price for GP it is Swann that moved the goalposts and begged for an installment before the legals were complete, would you pay for a house before you had a survey done? His preferred option is still to purchase GP and redevelop but if Swann wants to leave it to become derelict and overgrown then that’s his choice. Hilton cannot simply walk away either, he is already £2 million in!

    Every word you have printed in that post that I have quoted is the exact opposite to what David Hilton said publicly at the fans forum.
    I was at that forum and I sat on the front row less than 10 feet away from him, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with my memory and the notes I was taking at the time.
    Perhaps you would like to reassess your post.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Solidarity with Bru #266160
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    This forum itself is not toxic, unfortunately there are at least 2 posters on here that wish to make it toxic though.
    One of them even felt the need to take his views to another social media platform and attempt a hatchet job on not only this sites owners but the members and moderators to.
    When his plan spectacularly backfired he attempted to come back claiming he was misunderstood.
    Nobody on this site as far as I’m aware have any good words for Peter Swann and his family, Peter Swann and he alone is the reason our club are in the position we are in now.
    Because of Swann’s mismanagement the majority on this forum are sceptical of the new owner and have every right to be.
    The old saying has never been more apt.
    “Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me”.

    I have not witnessed once any aggression from any members on this site, Twitter or Facebook directed towards any member who publicly backs David Hilton.
    The opposite however is true for anybody who dares to question David Hilton/ Whites tenure so far at the club, hardly surprising really as aggression appears to be the way that Hilton/ White addresses anybody who questions him on social media.
    We all want what’s best for our club, I sincerely hope that David Hilton/White is the saviour that we all crave but we as supporters should be sceptical especially after witnessing what an egomaniac like Peter Swann managed to do to our once proud club.

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: David white #266052
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Spat his dummy out on Twitter and deleted his account.
    Spat his dummy out on Facebook and deleted his account.
    Anybody offering odds on when he joins Iron Bru?

    in reply to: David white #266041
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    He’s permanently deactivated his account.
    History repeating itself.

    in reply to: Humberside coverage #266031
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Very much doubt Humberside will be covering our games, try Radio Derbyshire.

    in reply to: Brigg Town #266018
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    Firstly,AFAIK a player doesn’t have to be registered to play in a friendly.
    I wasn’t aware of the quote from Dean but the word “Hope” maybe suggests that the rumours may have substance.
    We’ll find out this afternoon.

    in reply to: Brigg Town #266014
    sufc.not.on.toursufc_not_on_tour
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 29

    At 3 o’clock today the rumours currently circulating will be proved to be correct or incorrect.
    I hope they’re just rumours with no substance but in recent months many of these rumours are eventually confirmed as true.