Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sent off once in 25 league games and that’s the conclusion you come to?
It shouldn’t have been a red, for either player. Somehow they did eachother over with their playacting.
Get a grip.
What about the other prizes? Some that money can’t buy.
Surely what we can AFFORD is still greater than the majority of NL/NLN/NLS clubs?
Our average attendance is 6th best out of the 72 clubs in the National League system.
FAQs cover all the lottery options, it isn’t SUFC specific.
SUFC have opted for the monthly draw as their PR states.“Every month one lucky United fan will pick up the cash jackpot, and we’ll have a number of runners-up prizes up for grabs as well, which may vary from month-to-month”
How is the above so hard to understand?
A child could understand it.You never change do you.
“ I don’t care how good he is, he needs moving on and replacing with a loan player. That’s a piss take at this level.”
Pretty demanding.
Why are you all demanding our best players are sold? Let the board do their job and decide who goes and who doesn’t.
Promotion to the NL will probably be worth more than the 100k a year Roberts or any other players may be on.
I’m sure between the 6/7 board members they can get the club through this season then implement a more realistic budget.
Also when GP is signed over to the club more sponsorship will be forthcoming. Naming rights for GP hopefully being the first.
Awaywego, they walked in because the alternative was no SUFC!
Personally I don’t think the budget needs to be halved. Gate receipts, sponsorship, merchandise etc will be a lot more than 780k surely???
1 user thanked author for this post.
People need to stop panicking, if the debt is now 800k that is easily manageable once all the urgent bills have been paid.
Once GP is back under SUFC control it will bring in more revenue through sponsorship etc to help see us through until the end of the season when a more realistic playing budget can be implemented.
Season long loans with 28 day recall will be fine.
Once we have our asset back there’ll be no major panic.
Pretty sure the eviction would affect SUFC more than it would Hilton. Each to their own though.
Sure there’ll be something else to be triggered by tomorrow.Football is very cultish except for those who for some strange reason would rather use social media to rip their club to shreds. Not just at SUFC, but around the country.
Where’s the line when it comes to someone’s net worth and whether you’re ‘allowed’ to spend on them?
Why do so many of you get triggered by supporters choosing how they want to spend THEIR money?
They are passionate about the club and want to help in every way they can, unlike some of the idiots who have done nothing but moan on social media about the club since the internet was invented.
Same culprits EVERY season.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Fitzsimons, Barrows, Kougun, Evans, Denton, Kelly, Scales, Clunan, Roberts, Law, Whitehall all played.
What’s next?
He has left Facebook.
Don’t blame him, it’s a toxic environment.
Some things are more important than money. Nobody made you squander £millions chasing the dream of Championship football. Don’t punish a whole community for your failures whilst owner.
Accept you f’d up, give the club its land back and disappear into the sunset.
1 user thanked author for this post.
So why would there be any issue starting the season there if no one has ruled otherwise? If we are issued with an eviction notice and refuse then I can understand the points made.
Who in authority has said SUFC have no legal right to be on GP land?
Not to a level that would be considered ‘splashing the cash’ for SUFC.
Cal Roberts is probably the only exception coming from the SPFL.
Our budget should naturally be higher than every club in the NLN and majority of clubs in the NL.
Since when did Scunthorpe United signing NL/NLN players become ‘splashing the cash’?
I can’t imagine Boreham Wood, Kings Lynn, Altrincham, York, Eastleigh etc are big spenders!
Chesterfield decontaminated their land and built their stadium within 17 months.
Not saying ours will get built but it shows it’s perfectly possibly if things go smoothly.
All fees set by tribunal include a sell on clause as far as I’m aware.
-
AuthorPosts