Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future players #278225
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Jenkins looks a decent prospect but was obviously brought in to cover for Clunan’s injury.

    He is not going to break into the holy trinity that is our midfield so will probably be heading back to Leeds in a couple of weeks.

    Might have been just the circumstances of the particular games but the last couple of times Wilson has come on Jimmy has put him in midfield rather than wide or up front. Don’t see him as a midfielder myself but Jimmy might have a masterplan.

    At the start of the season we were complaining about having too many midfield players. Now if Jenkins does go back we look very light for cover.

    Only really Shrimpton as Jimmy seems to see Beestin as a wide forward.

    in reply to: Solihull Game. #278020
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    A bad weekend in the cup but a fine weekend in the league.

    Well done Chester. Back in our hands and a chance on Tuesday to create a bit of daylight.

    in reply to: Jimmy Dean #278019
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    You can probably work out how many of the signings were Jimmy’s choices by checking how many of the bargain bin signings are still at the club and making the starting 11.

    It’s a nice round number.

    in reply to: Jimmy Dean #278001
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Yes. Clever lad that Hilton.

    Nearly as astute as his predecessor.

    in reply to: Jimmy Dean #277988
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Very harsh to blame Dean for that sh1tshow. Pep wouldn’t have kept us up with those players.

    in reply to: Solihull Game. #277987
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Agree Les Buxton are masters of negative football and shithousery.

    Of course those tactics rely on having a weak referee which in this league is almost a given.

    If we were to only win 1 more away game this season please let it be at Buxton in a couple of weeks time.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Jimmy Dean #277983
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Oh dear. We must have lost a game.

    Never good to lose a match with a substandard team performance but writing off the manager and captain seems a bit of an overreaction.

    Check out the league table Fansy. Then check it for the previous 5 seasons.

    Blessing in disguise I am hoping. Every further round we progressed would have meant rearranging Saturday league fixtures to additional Tuesday games.

    Only promotion matters. If Jimmy and Michael help us achieve that then job done. If not then we can question things.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Solihull Game. #277965
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Disappointing game, performance and attendance.

    Sad to see Solihull have succumbed to the standard National League methodology of spoiling and shithousery. They used to be a good footballing side and a pleasure to watch. They have turned into Borehamwood.

    Still better than us though tonight. 5-4-1 without the ball (sometimes 5-5-0) until they went down to ten. Attacked well for the first 10 minutes to stamp their authority and physicality on us and then went into their shape and waited for our mistakes. We obliged.

    It’s the template to beat us a la Curzon and Buxton. Close down Butterfield and we become a team of ponderous and misplaced passes.

    Probably enough poor teams in NLN for us to get away with it but if we do go up we will struggle in the National League without a plan b and c. Has Jimmy got one?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Solihull Game. #277949
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    News just on the OWS about streaming for tonight’s game Les.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Solihull Game. #277891
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Anything over 2,000 is a good result for a none league cup competition on a Friday night.

    Solihull fans would probably fit in 1 bus.

    Despite the reduced admission charges still a welcome earner given only under 12’s and 100 club members don’t pay.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Targeted Attendance #277851
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Got to find new things to talk about.

    We love our new owner.

    We like our manager.

    We rate our team and players.

    Our club owns it’s ground.

    Nothing to argue about.

    in reply to: Fa trophy #277834
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Don’t think it will be streamed with it being a cup game but hope I’m wrong Plymiron.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hereford United #277825
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Fantastic way to start life completely free of toxic owners.

    in reply to: Fantastic #277824
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Neither do I Fansy but smiled because it is probably Waltham just trying to wind up his old best buddy Peter Swann.

    in reply to: Fantastic #277817
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    That is paragraph three Fansy. The second paragraph:

    As part of the deal, an anticipated 100 jobs are expected to be created from developments around the ground along with up to 150 homes for older residents and people with complex needs on an area which already has outline planning permission.

    in reply to: Hereford United #277812
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Missing it as well Awaywego. Been fighting man flu all week.

    Should have gone and coughed and spluttered my way through it.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fantastic #277805
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Says so in the second paragraph of the joint Club/NLC statement released on Thursday.

    in reply to: Hereford United #277797
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I do wish they would put stuff like this on the OWS. Not everyone does the social media malarkey.

    The Twitter feed used to be replicated at the bottom of the latest news page on the OWS but does not seem to work these days.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hereford United #277792
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    On their Twitter feed about an hour ago Awaywego.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fantastic #277787
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I have seen nothing apart from the statement by the local MP that central government contributed financially in any way to the ground solution. It appears to be a local council decision and contribution.

    In the written and electronic propaganda that I regularly receive from North Lincs Council every penny they spend is presented as a special gift from the Tories so it’s hard to be sure what finance comes from council tax and central funding and what, if any, comes from additional or so called levelling up funding.

    I did read somewhere, possibly from Max Bell that the whole council supported the solution so to claim it as a gift from the Tory party is stretching credibility.

    In truth for once I don’t care where the money was sourced from. Inevitably it originated from the pockets of taxpayers. I am just delighted to have a club and a ground that are Swann and Hilton free zones.

    I did raise a little smile that 6 months or so ago NLC allegedly told Hilton and Swann that outline planning permission on the land had lapsed but now the council are involved it has been magically re-granted.

    in reply to: Duller than 80s soviet union #277430
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    9 points short of our highest points tally in 6 seasons.

    in reply to: What If? #277222
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Not to mention how to finance the £3m ransom for the ground for the one that “stole” it.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fa trophy #277143
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Good chance to see how our current team stacks up against a team sitting where we would like to be next season.

    Unless they have changed their style they will come to attack us so should be a decent game and should draw a healthy crowd.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: East Fife #277115
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Would have done better with Dot Cotton.

    in reply to: Fa trophy #276997
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    First ever trophy game for me as well Awaywego.

    Even though ticket prices much reduced the fact that season ticket holders have to pay means even a 1500 crowd is a bit of a welcome earner.

    A win and a decent couple of home draws in later rounds would be helpful for the new owners.

    in reply to: Home Sweet Home #276970
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    If reports on social media are correct it might be a little premature to go full party mode on this.

    It’s claimed the club will own 25% of land (ground?) and an as yet unknown 3rd party will own 75% (car parks and training pitch).

    Might be a load of BS of course but after our last 2 owners I’m holding the champagne for now.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Lynn’s King #276888
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    In our remaining away games apart from Spennymoor and South Sheilds there is a fair chance that all the other teams will have seen Curzon, Buxton and Kings Lynn demonstrate the way to beat us and set up accordingly.

    Even Spennymoor and South Shields might do the same given the spanking they both received when setting up to take us on at GP.

    Our midfield 3 are all very good footballers in their very different ways but none are “scrappers”. Scales has a bit of an edge but is more likely to win a card than a tackle.

    In the away games we have lost and drawn they have been against (at least) a midfield 4 that have tackled and harried and generally stopped our 3 from playing. This stops the quality service the 2 wide forwards rely on to create openings. They become ineffective because neither Law or Smith are guys that fight for and win possession from poor quality passes or long ball clearances.

    This in turn leaves the central striker fighting a loan battle which is not Whitehall or Elliott’s forte.

    For me we need to add a defensive sitter in midfield to even up the numbers. Shrimpton likes a tackle and a scrap so would be my choice. Sacrifice Smith and Law and play Elliott up front with Whitehall.

    Denton and Barrows should be looking to provide width and crosses for the front two and pushing opposition full backs or wing backs to defend. The centre backs are usually dealing with a single striker so should be fine particularly wit a sitting midfielder in front of them.

    Less pretty and pure but more pragmatic at this level for away games against the “middling” teams.

    A bit too old school 4-4-2 for Jimmy?
    Call it an inverted diamond to jazz it up a bit and get on with beating some of these poorer sides away from home. We can probably risk the home set up against the Darlington and Bishop Stortford end of things but we are not going to blow away half decent NLN teams playing their “Cup finals”.

    in reply to: Helen Conley #276680
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I would have given a red for the foul on Scales late on but otherwise agree she got most things right.

    Both teams played the game in the right way so not a difficult match to referee.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Gloucester City #276643
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Thought the ref was one of the better ones we have had this season albeit a low bar.

    Sign of a championship winning side that wins a game comfortably without playing well.

    in reply to: Gloucester City #276631
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Poetry in motion apparently Bill.