Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NLN – TOTS #285409
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Interesting the play off finalists only got 1 player between them.

    Wonder how many will pitch up at Wembley for the National League final. The average home attendance for the finalists added together is less than our average in the league below.

    in reply to: Callum Roberts’ shirt #285407
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Agree Cass. Needs someone more media savvy than I but assume we should embrace Twitter and Facebook at least.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    admin SST
    in reply to: Callum Roberts’ shirt #285403
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Forgot to add I’ll have a tenners worth if we’re having a raffle.

    in reply to: Callum Roberts’ shirt #285402
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Same thing these days.

    Anything we can do after site costs are covered should go to support the club until it’s debt free.

    Happy to start the bidding at £50 if we’re having an auction.

    in reply to: Boston #285387
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Absolutely right Awaywego. Twice as far to Brackley but takes about 20 minutes more.

    And you can see the whole game when you get there.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Boston #285383
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Well done Boston. Strange team – only bother to score if they absolutely have to.

    Won’t miss their away end though. Worst of the season with too many people in too small a space.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Butler’s got the nod #285370
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Nelson is not going to come here for a 1 year assistant manager gig so debate is irrelevant.

    Butler will likely do what 90% of new managers do and bring in one of his mates. New managers like to be sure of 1 friendly face in the changing room.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: NATHAN STANTON #285355
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Only the number 9.

    Does anyone know what that’s all about?

    in reply to: Butler’s got the nod #285332
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    New gaffer talking a good game on Hullberside. Interesting references to being fitter, having the right mentality and player development.

    The main 3 things the previous regime didn’t do effectively.

    in reply to: Good riddence #285221
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I suspect the board are majoring on the costs of Jimmy and his two mates.

    It deflects any Stelling type criticism for not offering a contract to to man who led us to second place.

    Need not have bothered as we have long since dropped off the radar of the likes of Sky Sports.

    Bit or sarcasm in my earlier post Cass.

    in reply to: Good riddence #285193
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    You can only judge on what you find 64 and I have not seen any of that evidence. As you probably can tell from other posts I am not a great fan of any kind of racism or of right wing nut jobs so had I seen such evidence it might have changed my views on how nice a guy he was.

    Either way he proved to be not very good at managing a full time professional football team so I am delighted the board found him too expensive to rehire.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Club Statement: Dean gone! #285179
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Either Muzzy is on 10 bob a week or he really is made of Teflon.

    in reply to: Good riddence #285159
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Having not seen a selection of his tweets then I am obviously at a disadvantage here.

    Perhaps you could share and justify your vitriol.

    in reply to: Good riddence #285148
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I did not want Jimmy Dean to be given a new contract for footballing reasons but this OP is crass beyond belief.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Bye-bye Jimbob! #285024
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    In which case it would be best for all concerned for the club to announce Dean’s new contract.

    in reply to: Chuckin It In #285002
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Don’t know how many games you saw Gurney to reach that conclusion. I saw every home game and about a dozen away games. Saw live streams of another 5 or so away games.

    All season we have been the footballing equivalent of flat track bullies. Any team that could be beaten with half an hours effort by a bunch of vastly superior footballer were despatched, often with a goal or three to spare.

    Any team with basic organisation, prepared to go 5-4-1 or 4-5-1 and work hard for the full 90 and we were clueless. Odd flashes of high quality from Butterfield, Smith and Roberts sneaked us the odd win in these games but usually we huffed and puffed without much idea until gifting the opposition a goal or two with a schoolboy error.

    Tactically we were outfought and out thought by most of the top ten clubs. One other observation is that I never saw another team where I would have swapped more than 2 of our players for their players.

    In my world this means the only reason we were not promoted was our coaching team was not up to the task. If they had started poorly and got better then I would say give them a chance to keep up the improvement but the truth of it is they started out OK and struggled to stay there.

    I challenge anyone to tell me in any way the team improved during the season?

    I challenge anyone to tell me a player that improved during the season? (apart from those that magically improved when they played on loan for other teams).

    I like Dean and was desperate for him to learn how to manage full time footballers. If he had a contract already for next season I would honour it.

    Would I give him and his staff a new contract for next season? No.

    Having said all that if Jimmy gets the gig I will be there supporting my club, my team and my manager next season but without great expectations.

    in reply to: Chuckin It In #284908
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    If you have any doubt that a manager or coach will not last a season then you shouldn’t be offering them a contract at all.

    What does a monthly or even a three monthly contract say to a manager and to the players he is trying to recruit?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: New article at The Athletic #284903
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Pretty sure it was one of dodgy Dave’s claims that the dispute between the club (Swann) and the Telegraph was resolved.

    Doesn’t mean it’s true of course.

    Does the Telegraph even report properly on the Cods or do they just copy and paste from other sources.

    in reply to: New article at The Athletic #284862
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    I think proceeds from the playoff semi and the final had we made it would have probably covered any player bonuses.

    in reply to: Chuckin It In #284843
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Of course not. I would not renew the coaching staff’s contract but that’s just an opinion.

    Will still be there at home. Probably won’t do the dozen or so away games next year if Jimmy is still here and still hasn’t worked out how to play away.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: How do you want to start next season? #284829
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    New manager, assistant manager, coach and goalkeeping coach.

    Not fussed about the other stuff.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SHOULD IT HAPPEN – SUGGESTIONS FOR REPLACEMENT #284803
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Ignore what I said about Billy Heath. Better him than old big hair.

    Nothing against getting the ball in the box quickly by the way Bill. It’s the constant petty fouling, play acting and time wasting that is a major part of what Alfreton do that I don’t like.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SHOULD IT HAPPEN – SUGGESTIONS FOR REPLACEMENT #284767
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    WG have you ever watched Alfreton play?

    It’s effective but it’s not what I would call football.

    A massive no to Billy Heath for me.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Bye-bye Jimbob! #284754
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    We can only “offload” players under contract if the player agrees.

    That usually involves the new club offering at least as much cash and being in an agreeable location.

    I remember Hurst being ‘instructed” to get rid of underperforming high earners. Amazingly he couldn’t find anyone daft enough to pay the likes of Perch 4 grand a week.

    in reply to: Ilkeston #284665
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Arsehole continues to demonstrate why they are an arsehole shock.

    in reply to: Another new low #284652
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Compared to the last 5 years of Swann and the whole of the Hilton fiasco then yesterday was a massive high.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Boston #284651
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    No the final will be at Brackley or Chorley. Both finished higher in the league than Boston.

    Neither will be as soft a touch as we were.

    in reply to: Park and walk #284507
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Boston website just has a link to the park and walk page on our site.

    Too late to direct Boston fans to John Leggat and Kingsway with Iron fans to town car parks and Donny Road?

    For 98% of fans of both clubs this will not be an issue but 2% of 8,000 is a fair few dickheads.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Park and walk #284504
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Walking back together might be even more problematic Ironawe.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Park and walk #284502
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    There are a fairly large number of fans who will have a problem getting into the town – and not just the 1500 from Boston.

    Not to mention getting back out and home again. However, now we know Fans is OK we can stop worrying over nothing.