Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dean doesn’t have the nous to change his approach, that’s the problem.
If we don’t go up this season it will be catastrophic, the board need to see it.
Plenty on the pay roll who could do a better job. Head says he’s going nowhere but with the squad we have to serve up this stuff, something’s not right
1 user thanked author for this post.
Has to be E
Of course it makes sense to go through the playoffs / the amount of additional revenue generated from those extra games could pull in north of £100-200k
You can play 6 up front. If you’re going to piss around at the back, let the opposition walk back into their formation and then pump the ball into empty space makes no odds. The only thing Dean has left to hang onto is possession stats, and even that drops when Beestin enters the pitch
1 user thanked author for this post.
Something is clearly not right and Dean looks helpless.
Whitehall was particularly disinterested – maybe tired from the new born but very ineffective
1 user thanked author for this post.
Can we embargo the manager from the premises?
Got to get it right / assume the budget is based on a number of season ticket sales and average attendances (probably 2.500-3,000) but if we keep serving up the dross that we’ve seen in the past few matches then the following season it’ll be 1,500 avg. which is still good for this pub league but our overheads will be a lot higher. If we fail to get promoted (and we need to play a lot better to stand a chance of going up through the playoffs) then I’d want somebody with a bit more footballing experience (as in league football) and that could be Butler – but do you give him total free reign for player selection? Or do you stick with Dean for another crack at promotion? If we’re looking at sustainability and long term then Dean isn’t the answer for me. But these are tough decisions ahead of us
1 user thanked author for this post.
If they score away from home one can hope they commit men forward rather than just sit back and allow us to pass aimlessly around the back 4 as we appear to do. If (I mean if) we go one up I don’t want to see the same garbage as we witnessed against Blyth.
Of course I forgot about Dean’s contract ending. There’ll be a shedloads of work to be done in close season. I don’t expect Dean should be part of that.
Turnbull has done OK in part, I think it went severely wrong when Swann junior and his agent buddy started buying players.
It’s a tricky one for next seasonI am slightly fearful of who will be sourcing the dozen or so players needed for next season, assuming none are offered new deals. I read somewhere a suggestions of Butterfield as a player coach – I think that is something worth exploring. Wealth of experience and seems like a good egg.
Elliot sub is a complete mind bender for me. We had nothing to lose by going 3 at the back and bringing on Whitehall with Elliot and go 3-3-3 after man sent off and goal down.
It was shameless stereotyping I agree.
Some were postmen who worked the morning shift…. Sorry I’ve gone full John Motson.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The game plan, however boring had eventually worked, 1-0 up a few breaks up field straight into a corner to try and waste time against a plumber who’d grafted all day and then played footy.
That’s plain embarrassing. Why didn’t we go into the corner against Rushall? (We’re a bit more comfortable at home against 9 part timers rather than 11 part timers away from home?). Guess what? It doesn’t work because as every but Dean will see it took 30 seconds from their corner to our goal. It’s been bollocks to watch for a few weeks now. Butler needs to get more involved as he’s the one with league experience.1 user thanked author for this post.
My view is that it is vitally important for our long term survival (that we go up). The goodwill will soon dissipate when we slide further into anonymity. We’ll have a core of supporters but we’re not a mad passionate local football supporting town. We’re massively out of the spotlight, BBC updates, Sky Ticker, general coverage. Long term it means less attraction for players and fans alike. We’ve watched some great football in the past but a long term stay in this division is not something I would look forward to, the quality is just too shit. Don’t mind consolidating in NL for a bit but NLN is just shit, the refs, the away fan(s) the grounds. It’s quirky for the first season but going to these places for the next 2-5 years – we’ll be down to 1,500 in no time and then we’ll be part time just hanging around these leagues with fat immobile centre forwards who ‘put it about a bit’. I watched last night and thought it was so slow laboured and not very enjoyable, how we’ve fallen so far so quickly, and this squad are supposed to be full time professionals
7 users thanked author for this post.
He won’t fit with JD’s not playing a striker strategy whilst chasing the game
3 users thanked author for this post.
Simple matter is that, on our biggest game for a good while the manager was left severely wanting in pre match set up and then in game decisions. Everyone in that ground could see it. Even the RH team who were as diplomatic as ever but you could sense their bewilderment. Games of this type and opposition of this type will come thick and fast in NL and he won’t have a clue what to do.
Said it enough times, thick as mince. No plan B and my god Beestin out wide- when will that ever work. Beestin isn’t worth a place in the squad. Torpey had it right on Humberside – bringing off Elliot and leaving Wilson and Beestin on the pitch was just bizarre.
When we need a plan B he just hasn’t got a clue. We looked aimless and leaderless in front of a bumper crowd
2 users thanked author for this post.
You just know Dean will play him left wing….
Southend Tuesday night about 15 years ago. Called off 19.30,
1 user thanked author for this post.
Problem now is 2 away games in a row and I am not convinced Dean can get the 6 points we definitley need
Called off? If so I reckon the club will
lose around £20k for that decision, I would expect 5k plus tomorrow Tuesday night 4k.The old Mussolini made the trains run on time…. The last shelter of those desperate enough to defend the indefensible. He tried to destroy the club for personal gain, ending 124 years of local/community history – ‘yes but he employed somebody to do really nice burgers so it’s not all bad’
2 users thanked author for this post.
If his contract is up end of season then doubt they’ll get rid until then. He is very limited intelligence and tactical wise and there is no way we should be putting performances like we have been against players who have full time jobs in the day and this is their hobby. Dean and Beestin both worry me at the minute, both have competency issues – for one reason or another.
2 users thanked author for this post.
100% agree Les, on his day Beestin can be a match winner – and was adding goals again. Now it’s all gone backwards a bit.
He seems disinterestedIt will boil down to the manager – let’s see how Dean sets the team up and then adjusts should the pattern of the game dictate such. The subs last game cost us and definitely weakened the side. I would be asking Beestin if he isn’t fit enough to track back off his own mistakes should he really be considered?
Dean went negative with his subs and paid the price. Hopefully he’ll learn. We won’t win the league by being ponderous.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Subs lost the game for us. Beestin headless chicken and played out wide again. Shrimptom did nothing and Roberts replaced by Kelly gave them more invitation to advance – which they didn’t need. We had no shape no coherence when those subs were made and they made us substantially worse on the pitch. I am getting quite annoyed at how Beestin gives up tracking back – even when it’s him who lost the ball.
-
AuthorPosts