Forum Replies Created
-
sounds like another team who will sit in frustrate us and try and nick one Match preview, AB interview #1 “we’ve had them watched, hard working team with a threat. The lads have been briefed, we will aim to nullify their threat (of an ave of 1 goal/game scored). Why not take a risk perhaps start at pace on the front foot and keep it going for, oh i don’t know 90 mins!! A league with no dominant team and we haven’t stepped up.
with the exception of Roberts they are all limited. He is the only player we have who could cut it at FL level
1 user thanked author for this post.
if only they were full time fit athletes with nothing else to do!! Jeez just do their jobs like everyone has to and don’t buy into the modern generations i cant cope with working too hard
1 user thanked author for this post.
The subs weren’t the ones who switched off to allow their second. I thought Carlton and Fadera helped us to defend as it meant their defenders had to be on their toes and not push out and camp in in our box. We had numerous decent breaks when a better ball would have set up a decent chance, i think one time Scales had 3 in the middle and didn’t find any, we hit the bar (which if it was Beck his detractor’s would have called it a sitter), Beck won more free kicks than Whitehall (who the ref wasn’t going to give any to). I’d rather watch us keep the pressure on them and be entertained than sit back and invite pressure. Sometimes you have to risk losing to win. We had more opportunities to score a 4th than they did to equalise. I’ll settle for that each week.
3 users thanked author for this post.
same old same old – tough game according to AB.
2-2 after been 2 up, AB starts to sit back, defensive subs inviting pressure, equalise in added time.
Post match interview individual error not a tactical one, work in progress, battling draw against team above us, look ahead to another tough game Sat will try to make up ground, though i didn’t realise how far behind we are!! Perhaps risking losing trying to win is an option1 user thanked author for this post.
ends up 7 – shows our inability to match the endeavour or management of ‘lesser’ teams. We will limp into the play-off with this mindset.
2 users thanked author for this post.
As said he did a job and did it pretty well. We weren’t in free flowing attack mode 2nd half!! He won the ball, kept it/laid it off, flicked it it on.
I view it from Kings Lynn point of view, Whitehall taken off and its Beck an experienced forward not Fishburn or Carlton out of position taking his place. Kept their defence honest and defending. Yes it would be nice if another forward scores but winning is fine.We sign a player who is a success at another club playing a certain way. We then play him in a different way and are surprised at the outcome!! I’d be more concerned if Beck was heading crosses off target yet to see him get a cross put in to him. We hit long balls to him and no one is playing up with him. Same with Carlton, a scoring winger and we ask to be a striker! Only now is he playing wide in a 3.
We are confused understanding AB’s weekly change in style, formation and players. These simple players (no insult we are at NLN) want to be a round peg in a round hole, have no chance. Recent example AB plays Whitehall (good No.9) as a No.10. From the start of the season ABs instance that full backs can be wing backs. Judge players when they asked to do the job they are here to do. Butler is no genius coach and neither are the players good enough to adapt. Keep it simple and have a style that suits and get good at it by playing it week after week.4 users thanked author for this post.
