[64]

The 1st goal we gave away was a joke and our overrated keeper barely tried to defend it and his day didn’t really get better from that moment apart from one save hit straight at him from close range. Second goal wrecked our confidence and we visibly backed off although we had some exciting breaks.

[64]

Back to dragging my posts back up again?

[64]

It went a bit cup tie.Sick of this idea of holding midfielders.We need footballers who can play not restricted “specialists”

[64]

Anyone there would have known the CEO wasn’t on the walkabout .

[64]

Attacking football with jeopardy

[64]

Certainly “showed “

[64]

I was sat behind you

[64]

Just because you can it doesn’t mean you should use so many

1 user thanked author for this post.

Awaywego

[64]

It’s exciting if anything else?

[64]

Imagened

[64]

Frustrating but enjoyable

[64]

Yes you can when it’s as overtly ridiculous as these people

[64]

Why’s that,is it not straightforward with enough lines in between for you to make stuff up about?

[64]

it’s an SOS, Save Our Shell?

1 user thanked author for this post.

Rene Artois

[64]

Apparently they want to get involved and want 51%.It seems the for sale signs are up but not all in agreement
It would be hoped that they would be laughed out of the door .

[64]

Iron Bru catching up with the modern world,click bait Matt is his new moniker

[64]

Late night shopping?

1 user thanked author for this post.

Deereyme66

[64]

The only thing I find disrespectful here is the assumption they will get standing ovation.

[64]

That’s my mind made up. Nobody says they wouldn’t want sustainability

[64]

Not by me

[64]

Maybe but the inference is there and it’s clear to see.It’s at best badly worded and I find it hard to believe they didn’t see it

[64]

There are clear references to stuff the Unity group are accused and it’s not necessary ,
By we can argue I meant as fans we can on facebook etc about any subject but the trust is and should be professional and above reproach in all it’s communications.

[64]

we can argue all we like but Trust communication in my opinion are not to be used to exacerbate a situation with pithy jibes

[64]

I think the statement from the trust is pretty crass in the current atmosphere, They didn’t have to mention certain aspects which would clearly trigger.

[64]

Awaywego wrote:

If the club are letting them use the club premises them they are pretty much backing the unity group.
And once properly formed will be an official SUFC organization why wouldn’t they there’s money involved.
The club need someone overseeing the meeting and group to make sure all the i’s and T’s are crossed by the group for the sake of the club.

Absolutely made up . Using a room at GP does not make you a club organisation. The club my recognise them like they do Irish iron etc .

[64]

I think certain users have blocked me from seeing their posts

[64]

it seems susan replied and deleted

[64]

He’ll have a say in it too,if any offer comes in

[64]

I think I got too involved yesterday, reckon I’ve said enough

1 user thanked author for this post.

Awaywego

[64]

“The Scunthorpe United Unity Group will be launched on Friday 7th February 2025, the meeting will take place at the Sir Ian Botham Suite, at The Attis Arena starting at 7pm doors open at 6.15pm, membership is available from now and membership forms are available from Jerry Mahony, Stuart Maw & Karen Lee to join it will cost £10 for the duration of the life of the Scunthorpe United Unity Group. At this meeting the interim Committee will step down and a new committee will be voted in, this will be voted in by people who have joined the Unity Group, people who join on the night will be able to vote.”
It doesn’t say what they want to do. Hi we’re setting up a group called Unity give us a tenner.

[Author]

Posts