Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dilapidated #211675
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    And I think Iron64 makes a very valid point about the opposition seeing the state of the place as they approach. They must think ‘here’s a club who clearly don’t give a toss about the ground, and everyone says they’re hopeless on it too. Let’s batter them and get out fast!’. Also what sort of inspiration does it give to Cox and the squad? Must be disheartening.

    These aren’t minor gripes, they effect the very fabric of the club, it’s mindset, attitude and outlook. ‘Shape up or ship out’ springs to mind.

    in reply to: Dilapidated #211653
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    I’m only expressing opinions I and many others, including you, feel Alcazar. And I’m sure there’s plenty of your detrimental comments about me were justified. However, likewise, I will endeavour to keep our disagreements constructive in future and try to avoid the unnecessary bickering and unsavoury reactions.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Dilapidated #211628
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Wow how did you some of you survive at old grounds like Saltergate? Such snobbery from football customers.

    Fans not customers!

    Pointless comparison. Saltergate’s been closed around a decade and, perhaps you’re not aware, that s***hole wasn’t the home of the Iron? Personally, I always enjoyed my visits there but I wouldn’t have wanted it as my home ground. Many of us are ex-OSG, so we’re quite used to slumming it mate. Nowadays, we should and do expect better. I suppose you think all those complaining on Twitter are wrong too? Nice try, trying to turn this in to a culture war though. What next, anybody who dare complain about on and off the field matters is a ‘snowflake’?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Dilapidated #211581
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    I took a duster again yesterday to clean our seats, we had been in different seats against Hull City. In my opinion it is a very poor state of affairs. I listened to the Podcast the other night and Mr.Swann laughed this matter off, it matters to me Peter. UTWI

    The reply regarding the seats ought to have been, ‘really? I’ve not been down to see, but leave it with me and I’ll look in to it because that’s not acceptable. If I expect you to part with good money to come down here, you should expect better when you get here’. Instead, it’s treated as a joke. And trust me, it’s a lot more than a dozen or so moaners mate.

    9 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Home attendances #211563
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Don’t expect to start seeing an improvement on the pitch if the basics off it are being ignored.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Home attendances #211562
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    It’s not that dirty seats, tatty flags and blocked drains are major issues in themselves, it’s the message that, and the general neglect of the stadium, gives out. It’s basically saying ‘I don’t really give a toss about the ground and the supporter experience’. He admitted he hasn’t even been down to have a look. How can you expect people to care if it looks like you don’t? This attitude will permeate through the club, from the top down. Where’s the pride in stewardship gone? Lead by example.

    in reply to: Home attendances #211550
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    There might also be a case to be argued that he seems better at overspending than managing within means, given we almost reached the Championship twice and were being served up decent football with some excellent players. Now that the debt is wiped clean, why not ho again? After all, he may now own the ground, but apparently ‘nothing’s changed’.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Home attendances #211549
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    National League don’t have any tight financial rules as fair as I’m aware?

    Our budget is determined by how many fans we get through the gate, which is determined by how many games we win, which is determined by how good our players are, which is determined by our budget. All connected.

    Yes there are some exceptions to the rule but not many.

    Thanks for that UTI99, you may well be right with your first point, but the rest of your explanation is too simplistic and doesn’t explain why a lot of budgets of NL clubs is higher than a lot of L2 clubs. All you’ve done is say Swann is managing the budget like a household one now, which everybody knows. It doesn’t help with answering the question, unless you’re implying that those NL clubs are either overspending or have higher revenue from Gate receipts?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Home attendances #211531
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Are they overspending in general, or have they got higher revenue?

    in reply to: Home attendances #211530
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    I would have liked the interviewers to ask Swann why it’s the case that so many National League clubs have a higher budget than many League 2 clubs, because I don’t know why that is. Excuse my ignorance but can anyone here explain please?

    in reply to: Building Bridges? #211427
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Sorry for the negativity but these two initiatives sound like one bright spark’s ideas to ‘come up with a few things we can promote to appease the whingeing gits – something quick and easy and that doesn’t require too much resourcing’.

    I think it will take a lot more actual committed engagement to re-engage disenfranchised fans, but agree CT, it’s a start and hopefully more to come.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Lincoln game #211141
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    He worked for the council? Lol, he’s obviously a ‘replica pistol’ as far as Alcazar is concerned then!

    in reply to: Would they? #211104
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Or, rather than whataboutery and acting judge and jury you could just accept the decision of PFC, which is open to appeal after all. The nature of the group messages is more detailed here:

    https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/football/portsmouth-fc/three-under-18-portsmouth-fc-academy-players-released-after-racist-snapchat-messages-probe-3327127

    in reply to: Covid #210462
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    There’s a few posters on here who write as though they’re pinged most the time, and a few it might do the world of good for.

    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #210241
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    The players aren’t supporting Cullors or BLM. Some are determined to believe that’s the case. Quite why is open to interpretation.

    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #210237
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    And please don’t chip in with any ‘forum 6 are never wrong’ nonsense. These are individual views that happen to be shared by others. Every poster on here thinks their points are right otherwise why bother posting anything on a serious subject like this?

    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #210235
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    This has been raised before and the answer remains the same. The players are taking the knee against the anti-racism they face not in support of BLM. Anybody’s failure to respect that is bigotry. And please don’t anyone bother calling me a bigot because I don’t respect your bigoted views. It starts and ends with those not respecting the players.

    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #210233
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Keep politics on the non-football side please, unless I’ve got a point to make, then suddenly it’s not a problem.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fans panel #210143
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Nothing more to be said. It’s there for all to see. Thanks.

    in reply to: Fans panel #210137
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    No. I’ve said twice I’m calling you homophobic because you thanked this post from Big J in your ‘taking to the knee’ thread (it’s still there if you look):

    ‘Pride is being pushed on the masses to normalise degeneracy! It’s nothing but queers showing how debauched they are with kink and attempts to recruit children to the gay agenda! They want more gays! Society is being engineered to make our kids gay as part of the great replacement and population control!

    I doubt Harry Kane has much say on the matter! He has been told by those higher up to wear it to make it seem normal to the masses! Though many can see through the tricks of the libtards to normalise sodomy! Such acts were rightfully seen as disgusting and now they are being normalised to protect the feelings of queer snowflakes who can’t handle criticism for their lifestyle choice!’

    Another reason someone like you shouldn’t be on a fans panel. You seem unable to interpret and rationalise basic facts. That’s putting it politely.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fans panel #210135
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Either explain why exactly or give it up as a bad job. Buy don’t start trolling me again. I’ve told you how weird that is before.

    in reply to: Fans panel #210128
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Oh and by the way deere, queer and lesbian is the correct terminology used in the UK.

    What are you talking about?? Are you attempting to correct me on something? If so, explain what I’ve got wrong.

    in reply to: Fans panel #210127
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Firing line? More BS exaggerations from you awaywego! As for j charles, if you can’t see that publicly liking extreme online racist or homophobic posts says everything anybody needs to know about you than you’re living on cloud cuckoo land. You shouldn’t be anywhere near a fans panel with those hateful views. Hopefully the decision makers see you for what you are.

    in reply to: Fans panel #210107
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Lol, it’s not even once a month, its every two!

    in reply to: Fans panel #210105
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Whether we share similar views on how the club is run or not, having anyone on the panel who publicly likes extreme racist and homophobic online content is plain wrong IMO. As for being easy to sit back and let others do it, that may be true but you are forgetting that some fans are not willing to sign up to an appeasement offer, which based on the owners track record, is more than likely what it is. It’s hardly a job or major commitment either, as you’re making it out to be. What is it an hour or so once a month? Do me a favour!

    in reply to: Fans panel #210102
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    BS it means nothing, and you know it. ‘Speak on behalf of us who are anti-knee’. Do you realise how pathetic that sounds?

    in reply to: Fans panel #210098
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Application completed, we will see what happens next.

    If they’re looking for people who thank extreme racist and homophobic posts I think you’re nailed on.

    in reply to: Fans panel #210097
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Nice one j Charles if genuine. Your certainty not a yes man and your view’s are not the same as mine on alot of things but I will back you.

    Why will you back someone who routinely ‘thanks’ the Big J poster that posts extreme racist and homophobic content?

    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Pretty much agree with that apart from the ‘unprecedented success’ part. Two failed League One play off finals isn’t a success.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #210046
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 113

    Very good 😆