Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Forest Green Matchday thread #195638
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    I agree with Mike and Tom – this was a very good FG side. We aren’t equipped to deal with such ability and organisation in Division 4.
    I’m rather hoping that we take plenty of points off the other weaker sides.

    Is it a coincidence that almost every team we play look like top 3 material. Where have you spotted these other weaker sides les. Crawley were probably the worst team we’ve played so far, are there any weaker than them? Hard to see where our next win (or point) is coming from.

    in reply to: The Lineup I’d Like To See. (Or something pretty close.) #195592
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    FB is a certainly a problem les, Charlie Wilson has Spence at RB in his ST article. So how about:-
    Watson
    Onariase Cordner Bedeau
    Gillead Beestin Spence Eisa
    McAtee Loft Taylor

    Gillead & Eisa as wingers not WBs BTW so everybody ‘in position’ and Loft gets support.

    in reply to: 2020 UNITED / POPPY DAY BADGES. #195560
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    The full production run sold out in minutes WG, his other two fans bought one each and that was it.

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195539
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    2. The club supported him through a serious, long-term injury.

    As you would hope and expect any employer to do if one of their employees is hurt in their place of work.

    How would you expect the employee to respond?

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195533
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Three things:-
    1. He didn’t learn last time
    2. The club supported him through a serious, long-term injury.
    3. He has done precious little to repay that support. Minimal interest when picked to play in the months before the incident (and since) and reportedly requested a transfer in January.
    Has he earned further support – you decide.

    in reply to: Reason to celebrate…. #195530
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Put out the Man.City “shirkers”, give them another chance to show they want to play for us and see if they’re capable of learning a lesson. If not, then at least Cox will have learned something.

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195508
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    So why try and hide it knowing it would surface eventually, surely better to come clean immediately. Any club investigation would have been concluded before football resumed, you would think, and then he’s only got the trial to worry about.

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195502
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    I think the fairest thing would be to give him the same level of support in adversity that he has shown the club.

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195481
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    In L2 he’s a 10/10 for ability but effort only about 25%. Much rather have a 5/10 giving 100%.
    See lesgeo’s post (somewhere) about wasted talent, such a shame.

    in reply to: Tranmere Match Thread #195458
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    But their narrow wide men play as forwards supporting the striker, ours support the defence.

    in reply to: Ryan Colclough #195457
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Right age.

    in reply to: Cox’s Post Match Comments #195456
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Sadly we’ve gone the quantity rather than quality route on our squad and ended up with an unbalanced selection. Loads of wingers & strikers and short at FB & CM. As I’ve said before we are carrying a number of players who have little chance of making the matchday squad let alone the starting XI and virtually no hope of moving any out so too many toys for Cox to fit in to his toy box.

    in reply to: Cox’s Post Match Comments #195438
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Early days but Taylor looks a better bet than Vincent.

    in reply to: Cox’s Post Match Comments #195428
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    It would appear that Cox can only find room for 1 out and out forward and 2 vaguely attack minded players in his outfield 10. 7 permanently defending with the other 2 helping when we don’t have the ball. Virtually all our shots yesterday were from distance, the only option when all the other players are behind the man with the ball. Unauthorised attacking is punished by being played deeper or not played at all. We have players here capable of terrorising most L2 defences if they’re allowed to, set out to score goals and let the opposition do the worrying.

    in reply to: Tranmere Match Thread #195426
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    “Seems we may be trying to convert Abo Eisa into what he isn’t !! ”

    A little used bench warmer in a poor L2 team you mean.

    in reply to: Tranmere Match Thread #195414
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Our ‘best’ players in no particular order:-
    1. Not interested
    2. Injured.
    3. Playing out of position.
    4. On the bench.
    5. In the stand
    6. Looked like he could be among the best so moved out of position to become ineffective.
    Some good management needed.

    in reply to: Cox’s Post Match Comments #195413
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Deluded!!
    “I’m disappointed with the result but the performance was a good one”
    “We settled in and passed the ball well” and then ” We kept giving it away.”
    Also:-
    ” We must have had ten or eleven shots – but not many were on target, or six-yard entries which disappointed me.”
    ” The way we keep the ball is what we’re working on”
    I’m not a manager Neil but I know which of the above I’d be working on. No good keeping the ball if you’re not using it to score.

    in reply to: Tranmere Match Thread #195342
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Or we could be optimistic and call it 4-3-3?

    in reply to: Tranmere Match Thread #195333
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Advice from SUFC Twitter LL:-
    “For all technical queries, please email ifollow@efl.com or use the chat option in the bottom right corner of our website.”

    in reply to: Jake Taylor #195301
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    , has to be behind Loft, McAtee, KVV, Turan and probably Hallam

    Van Veen is currently injured, so unless he’s going to be played while wrapped up with duct tape, he’s not currently in the mix.

    But so is Olomola, you said yourself he’s 3 weeks away.

    in reply to: Jake Taylor #195259
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    “Olomola is about 3 weeks away as he’s not match fit”

    Do you really think he’ll get a game, doubtful he’ll make the match day squad IMO. Cox might want a quick look but that’s all it will be I reckon, has to be behind Loft, McAtee, KVV, Turan and probably Hallam, Green & Jarvis as well.
    Thanks MKI, should have said last two, I meant Yates and forgot Gabriel.

    in reply to: PREDICTION LEAGUEPROBLEM #195244
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    I also have a problem. I got as many points from the postponed game as I did, in total, from the four completed matches.
    Should I switch to the 2-1 method do you think?

    in reply to: Jake Taylor #195243
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Hope he’s as good as the last Forest loanee!!

    in reply to: Not winning well enough? #195230
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    If, as reported, Rodders refused a transfer request from Colclough last January he has much to answer for, unbelievable Jeff!

    in reply to: Not winning well enough? #195225
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    I reckon Colclough will be on a good wedge, probably beyond most of L1 & L2. That aside, have you seen anything in the last 18 months that you think would encourage anybody to buy him?

    in reply to: Not winning well enough? #195187
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Hard to see how Dales, Olomola, Mooney, Jarvis, Pugh and maybe more are going to get anywhere near the matchday squad if we don’t have a massive injury crisis. Is Cox keeping Eisa and McAtee out of the picture until the transfer window closes?

    in reply to: Not winning well enough? #195164
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Don’t think there have been any/many complaints about the 3 points, they were badly needed. The complaints about the type of football I can understand, we were promised attacking football and, as this is the latest in a list of unfulfilled promises, then fans are bound to express concern. Similarly regarding selection, it’s not ‘favourite’ players not being selected but BEST players that fans are missing, (and best players out of position when they are picked) Whether you support the complaints or not it’s all perfectly understandable IMO, you must know that Bru posters know best! Our ideals will take time, we have to be patient.

    in reply to: PLAYER RATINGS V CARLISLE #195147
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Do you mean the goal machine they have at Bradford?

    in reply to: PLAYER RATINGS V CARLISLE #195145
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Posted this on 10th Sept:-
    “Don’t underestimate the benefits of 10 outfield players giving 100% rather than 6 or 7.”

    No reason to change my view.

    in reply to: PLAYER RATINGS V CARLISLE #195140
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    If he had done otherwise people would have complained about giving away a late goal.

    Not if we’d already scored 3 they wouldn’t!!