Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Oxford City #291351
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    They’re ringing already in our house.

    Are you sure that’s not your telephone cass?

    Nah, doesn’t ring much since the old PIP thing finished. No mates you see.

    in reply to: Guiseley #291350
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Couldn’t hear what Roberts was saying, did he have reasons for that poor display?
    Probably saying he should have been on from the start and I wouldn’t disagree.

    in reply to: Guiseley #291334
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Jimmy didn’t have the nous to keep us in the NL, that’s why he got the job!
    (My opinion only)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Oxford City #291333
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    They’re ringing already in our house.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Guiseley #291314
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Two successive 1-0s might suggest scoring is a problem, in fact hitting the target seems to be beyond most of our lot at the moment. Apart from the ‘straight at the keeper’ efforts I don’t think either of the two latest keepers have been tested more than once or twice. Not good enough, maybe time for one less CB and a bit more up top?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Guiseley #291272
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    On RH X as 713.

    in reply to: Guiseley #291262
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    No RH commentary tomorrow due to the demand caused by the end of the CC cricket season (Which Surrey have already won) Available on TV Freeview apparently.
    Well done BBC.

    in reply to: Sponsorphiles #291261
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    The aim is SUSTAINABILITY with a view to ensuring our club has a long term future. I’d suggest “whatever it takes” is not an unreasonable course to achieve that.

    in reply to: Guiseley #291253
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Still thinking about it. I went 0-5 in the PL for Newcastle away so I might have to temper my optimism this time. I’ll wait for team news this time I think.

    in reply to: Guiseley #291251
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Like your set up IFA but doubt Butler will.
    Having learned (I hope) from the Newcastle tie I expect Fitz to start. Nicholson (ex Guiseley and long throw) in for The Fish and we might not be far away.

    in reply to: Go Get Him Andy. #291181
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Can’t place him, Cass.
    Does he have a physical presence?

    Well he’s solid to the touch les, were you hoping for a player that could ghost past defences?
    MK above mirrors my view, our passing has been woeful but, as I said, he’s only one of those I think we need. I’m with you re the big midfielder, I always prefer a bit of beef in there. Sadly Evans has only some of what is required and is certainly not the solution. I was hoping Brogan might be but it looks like Butler is not convinced.

    in reply to: Warrington Town FC #291169
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    The original opinion with which you disagreed was “far from convinced with our midfield.” Do we take it then that you are content with a midfield that includes Will Evans?

    in reply to: The Rewards Of A High Press #291155
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Possibly the KUTA we needed? A touch of complacency, or is it just that we can’t pass?

    in reply to: Sponsorphiles #291136
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    If perks like that can be included in the Sustainability model then I’m sure they’ll come back. We all knew that sacrifices would have to be made.

    in reply to: Scarborough Athletic #291118
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Blimey!! Questions on a post before it’s been posted. That’s some talent AWG.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Scarborough Athletic #291112
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    What I find concerning is, that of all Butler’s summer signings, only one has established himself as a regular starter. (As I’ve said elsewhere, if he didn’t have a long throw it could be none of them) That must call the recruitment questionable at best, effectively we are expecting a first time manager to turn last seasons non-promotion winners into a promotion winning team. Is that realistic or do we need to find and sign two or three guaranteed starters to give us the boost we (possibly) need?
    Remember:-
    Experience is learning from your mistakes.
    Wisdom is learning from somebody elses’ mistakes.
    Learn quickly Andy!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: HARRISON POULTER #291093
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Worried he might tell a few tales?

    in reply to: Scarborough Athletic #291056
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    4 decent CBs and it seems Butler doesn’t want to disappoint any of them. Maxi has done him a favour by being suspended. IMO if Nicholson didn’t have a long throw he’d be the one to miss out.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Scarborough Athletic #291045
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    I don’t like 3 CBs but it’s worked so far, 4 is just ridiculous. How do Brogan, Rowley & Shrimpton feel being behind Evans for a midfield start?

    in reply to: Terrible Choice #291031
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Have a good trip, have a great day and bring back the points. Cheers (but not too many)

    in reply to: Terrible Choice #291019
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Because fans who travel won’t have to get up at silly o’clock to get there,

    An hour and a half to Guiseley by car/coach, shouldn’t be a problem getting up surely.

    in reply to: Terrible Choice #291011
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    The early kickoff for only £2000 TV money should leave most fans happy that they haven’t chose us.

    It’s likely we’ll sell out our allocation which surely means that “most fans” won’t be able to watch the game. How will that make them happy?

    in reply to: Scarborough Athletic #290995
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    From AB’s pre match interview it looks like we will be without Whitehall (groin) and possibly Scales (dead leg) on Saturday, with Carlton is awaiting the results of a scan. We may be a little light!

    Fitzsimons
    Barrows Evans Boyce Nicholson Denton
    Roberts Clunan Brogan
    Fishburn Beestin
    Subs Kuoguan, Kelly, Law, Rowley, Shrimpton, Campbell.

    Starting 11 not too shabby, bench a striker light but not doom & gloom IMO.
    Time to get a loanee in?

    in reply to: FA warn Hilton #290947
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Only the same as one of our owners saying the money was a loan

    Entirely different. If things are as reported (aren’t they always?) an original donation appears to have become a loan when the donor became aware of the history of who he had donated it to. I don’t blame him.

    in reply to: FA warn Hilton #290928
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    ” club spokesman said: “The first of the initial six-figure backing has arrived. Utilising the contacts of the backer, these players have been brought in on a sustainable level. The money is in donations, not in loans, so the club will always remain sustainable.”

    Oh aye?

    in reply to: Warrington Town FC #290925
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    “Warrington Town can confirm it has accepted the resignation of Mark Beesley from his role as manager.”

    Seemed to know what he was doing at the AA and players clearly doing what he wanted.
    Another job lined up maybe?

    in reply to: Newcastle Town Chairmans view. #290915
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Someone else who wont be there then

    Well, will you?

    in reply to: Newcastle Town Chairmans view. #290910
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    you’re, won’t. I’ll not be there either, will you?

    in reply to: Newcastle Town Chairmans view. #290901
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    “Club targeting single punters dropped the price for them, costing me and families more than for a league game 1 senior 2 kids, From being free for kids under 12 last season they now want £5 each wtf.”

    Possibly down to the FA rules rather than the club’s decision?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Newcastle Town Chairmans view. #290872
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 111

    Butler has said that our substitutes don’t weaken the team. Today makes me disagree, did any of the’changes’ make a case for a league start? Not IMO, were there just too many ‘substitutes’?