Forum Replies Created
-
There is contact with his calf when you slow the video down and he is now struggling with a dead calf, so it will be interesting if he makes it tomorrow.
<noscript></noscript>All that the photo does for me is to see yheir guy falling, nothing else can be deducted from it, and I am sure that the ref did not have a slow motion shot of it.
As for making it for tomorrow Matt, it depends if his name is pulled out of the drum draw machine which Cox uses for picking his match day team.
Defiatley no penalty, just wishfull thinking.
So lets get an early start for the build up for Tuesdays home match against Oldham, we should make about five changes for this game in order to follow our squad rotation system that Mr Cox likes, even though it will weaken our team selection for that game.
The team will be instructed not to take any chances against Oldham, who are a very good team with some cracking forwards, our team will be informed by Mr Cox (with Mussa standing with crossed armes beside him) that although Oldham have only won ONE match in their last Eight games, but will be a big threat to us if we venture out of our own half, so lets play our udsual 5-4-1, and make sure that our goal keeper does not go wondering from his goal line if tempted to to try and cut out any crosses into our goal area.
Sounds sad, but it is very true!!!!!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Well guys no body will be attacking me tonight regarding the MOM, simply because we didn,t have one, team selection was shite, team tactics were shite, the whole team was shite and very few of them wanted to be playing, they were outplayed from start to finish.
HOWARD—5—Could have done better with both of their goals.
O’MALLEY—5—Took some really godd corners, but no forward even bothered to go for them.
BEDEAU—6—Probably played as well as any of them, but that means nothing tonight.
KAANAVAN—6—Not his usual self.
ROWE—5—Has played a lot better, too many free kicks given away.
BEESTIN—6—No link up between defence and forwards.
HIPPOLITE—6—Trie but not really good enough, dropped off after half time.
GREEN—3—disappointing, not involved in anything.
CLARKE—5—Not any better than he is at full back.
eisa—3—Not interested, looked non league class at very best.
LOFT—3—Should be on the bench if this playing system is used.SUBS—-5—None of them made any difference, the rot was too far instilled.
REF—3—Was bloody terrible, blew up every minute, not had a look at the number of free kicks awared, but it must be near 30 to 40.. Blew up contiually, whistle happy prick.
COX—2—-The team selection was a bloody joke, our best players all dropped to the bench at once, KVV, GILLIEAD, SPENCE, CLARKE all dropped so they can target next Saturdays game at Leyton, and had no intention of trying for points in tonights match.
This was one of the worse games I have seen by Scunny since starting watching them in 1951, in fact we did not have one shot on target in the 97 minutes, boring shite Cox.
2 users thanked author for this post.
When I saw the team sheet, I thought it was not the best, but they played very well, and possibly shaded posession, but did mot create many chances, so in faioness, a draw was a fair result. These are my rating marks for the team, some might noy agree, but I think they are very fair.
Howard–7–A bit unsure with a few crosses, a poor punch for their goal, but ok.
O’MALLEY—7—Played well and is due a run, forms a good pairing with Rowe.
BEDEAU—7–Looked very safe and defended well, parynered McgAHEY VERY WELL.
MCGAYHEY–7– Good defensive work, and kept the Salford players very quiet.
HIPPOLITE—7—The best I have seen him play, good to watch, some key through balls.
ROWE–7—Played very well (see O’Malleys comments).
HALLAM—5—Did not see a lot of him to be honest, maybe needs playing time.
SPENCE–8–Got through some very goodwork.
GILLIESD—8—Again my MOM, I hope we can get him sorted on a lomg term contract.
KVV—7—Really worked hard and we have missed him.
EUSA—5—Nice penalty, but he really is not playing well, lost it since last season.SUBS—ALL 6.
REF—8—Had a good game, Hippolyte booking was wrong, bit the ref did not award diving like most of them do.
COX—7—The team played very well and deserved their point, I hope that he gives O’Malley and Rowe an extended run in the team, but in general, well done today, and some supporters were over the moon after our game against Cambridge on Tuesday, EVEN THOUGH WE WERE BATTERED BY THEM, BUT TODAY WE REALLY PLAYED VERY WELL.
SALFORD BENCH—2–i recorded 41 verbal “fuck’s” from them during the 98 mins, they poor standard and it sounded to be all from the same lunatic.
Yes it was Beestin that scored, just a slip of the keyboard, but not quiet a hanging offence is it.
I’m afraid it is BS, as we speak a scaffold is being constructed outside your old boozer the Bellend. Please be there 6 o clock prompt on Friday, several moles will be available for any last request of yours that may be granted. Don’t forget to say cheese to the camera when the handle is pulled by Mr Bullybeeftin.
PS. Book an eye test.Iron-awe, funny thing pal, I have an eye test booked for 10-15 on the 9th March, but I think that my eyes need more than new specs, I must have had too many moles.
Tell them to make sure it is a strong scaffolding that will take at least 20 stoned, and one last request is for me to meet the FORUM SIX and treat them to a good piss up in the Bellend Pub ha ha! and no bloody need for any Moles, those little brats are too painfull.
Absolute rubbish Stampy, those marks where my asswssment for todays match, ok you are over the moon at the Scunny performance, but they were very, very luckey to take the points, and could (but where not) been 4-0 down at half time.
I agree what you say regarding it being a very, very, very good result and three very, very good points, but your comments are 100% based on the result, a few of the player were crap, Clarke, Green, Bedeau and Eisa if you need names, but as I have said many times, THESE ARE MY RATINGS and you have your own views, why don’t you submit your ratings and we will see wghat you think, but if we had lost 3-1 I feel sure your assessment would be completely differend, yes we had ONE SHOT ON TARGET IN 100 minutes, not that brilliant is it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Well that was some game, talk about Robin Hood, they dominated the first hour, but failed to take their many chances, we had ONE SHOT all game and came away with a win!!!
My ratings for tonights match being:-
HOWARD—8—Made saves when required, but his kicking found touch 70% of the time.
BROWN—6—Did ok and defended well.
KARACAN8—8—My MOM today, passed very well and good position all game.
McGAHEY—-7–Did his job, without being his usual outstanding self, but ok.
clarke—3—hE HAD A TERRIBLE GAME, POOR PASSING, CAUGHT IN POS
BEEDTIN—-5—-Not involved in much tonight, abcent for long spells.
GREEN—4—Did very little, never got involved, why select him???
BEDEAU—4—Caught in posession too many times, poor passing, getting worse.
GILLIEAD—7—Played well without being his normal self, difficult game for midfielders.
EISA—3—Never beat his man, dribbled into their players and lost the ball many times, and over hit crosses every time, how can a player go off so much???
KVV—7—Very difficult up front with yourself, but took his one chance very well.REF–9—A first class performance by him, did not react to dives, kept play going.
COX—5—Usual 45 mins defending all first half, one shot on target all 99 minutes, poor team selections with Rowe and O’Malley on the bench, Rowe should have starte instead of Clarke, and O’Malley should have started instead of Green. Very valuable but luckey three points, but Cambridge only had themselves to blame, good to see Howard have a good game, but his kicking should be handy when he turns to Rugby League for a couple of years before retiring. I think Onarise instead of Bedeau would vastly improve the team when fit.
1 user thanked author for this post.
