Forum Replies Created
-
… we gave the ball away too often with wayward (simple) passes.
Kouogun playing their striker in was something to behold…
1 user thanked author for this post.
It’s can be attractive to watch when we’re making 20 to 30 passes out from the back (and sideways), messing with the opposition’s shape and pulling it about to create holes. But the effort becomes pointless when we get into a shooting position and then just pass it sideways again with, often, less chance of scoring or the move completely breaking down. That’s when, for me, patience with Jimmy Dean’s style wears really thin. Being a little more direct up front wouldn’t go amiss.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Just so I’m not mistaken, is this Herbert character the guy who became best mates with Hilton, took over the Facebook group, tried to get peoples addresses, made veiled threats and is on crown court bail for some sort of football related criminal charge ?
I’ve never seen pictures of him with Hilton to back up the idea that they were actually mates. I’ve seen a picture of Sherbert with Simon Elliott, as well as a very matey video of them together outside a pub in Barnard Castle (where Elliott lives).
1 user thanked author for this post.
“Me and Michelle want you in the ground 100%”
Glanford Park? Or Scunthorpe’s version of ‘sleeping with the fishes’?
1 user thanked author for this post.
I spoke to Paul Hurrell on the subject of Herbert the other week.
He told me he had been told to keep away from GP for his own safety.
Apparently, there’s members on the Facebook forum not happy with him.He shouldn’t be ‘told to keep away from GP for his own safety’… He should be banned from GP for good. Launching a mobile phone would be the legitimate reason – but then bragging constantly about it on social media and also stirring up division in the ways that he did was appalling. The guy is a liability to the reputation of the club.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Remember though: there’s no gland in Glanford!
Not now Sherbert is banned, no.
Is he actually banned?
Hopefully so; Dark times when our only form of communication was through his Facebook rants alongside Wham
He was more than an unwitting conduit, he was stirring the pot good and proper.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Remember though: there’s no gland in Glanford!
Not now Sherbert is banned, no.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Noticed Dean was getting a bit of stick on social media last night, and the club in one post, though I think ‘SUFC, you’ve ruined my f***ing life’ is a bit dramatic. Even I don’t think that and I’m a right misery.
The club being run into the ground by a conman could be considered something that might ruin your life. Losing a Tuesday night match away in November could not.
4 users thanked author for this post.
Our country is wrecked, and is no longer in control of any problem, the trouble is who ever gets to be in Government will not action anything either, there was a time when it was a respected country and good for its people to live in, but you must admit that is not the case, and can anyone think that it will ever change?????????????????
Of course things get actioned – in the interests of the establishment. There is absolutely no interest in making your life better. It’s a class war, fought to keep you down.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Agreed.
However, Whitehall did not so much have a poor game – but rather, seemed to have been excluded from it.
So many decent chances to cross the ball into the box were simply not taken.We’ve only got ourselves to blame… but when the final whistle blew I did also wonder how the hell we lost that game 3-1. One of those occasions when the result is a bit freakish and doesn’t tell the true story? Or another worrying indicator that JD is able to set a very good side up but not do anything meaningful to alter it to suit what’s going on? For my money, a little bit of both.
1 user thanked author for this post.
