[alcazar]

Heath wrote:

“All I’m saying is, going by the maths, we’re down”.

Alcy wants you all to bow down to him at the end of the season as the only one on here who said we are going down. The guru!!

Everyone knows the team is crap, we are bottom of the league and we know how many points we have. All you are doing is stating the bleeding obvious.

You are pointing the finger at Hill, but somebody needs to manage this team and try to improve them. Looks an almost impossible task, but at least he is improving the players fitness and providing motivation that has been lacking for over 18 months.

Shut up, lefty libtard that you are.
I’m pointing the finger at no-one.
I’m pointing OUT that MAYBE Hill isn’t the answer, and MAYBE we are too far off being save-able for Hill or anyone to do owt.

Get over the FACT that I’ve been right more often than not, write the apology you owe me for previous insults etc and then do one.

Or aren’t you man enough to admit it?

[alcazar]

Swann has fallen out with virtually anyone who could have helped him.
Astute businessman?
Nope.
Utter w@nker.

1 user thanked author for this post.

inspector

[alcazar]

Awaywego wrote:

Do you think Simon has enough influence to get Max bell sacked and get in a more objective reporter?.

Mmm, lick, suck….oh Mr Swann….

[alcazar]

If the club sell on Wilson eithout the fans ever getting to see him feature, that is truly shameful.
There’s cashing in and there’s theft.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Heath

[alcazar]

I’m not berating Hill, for those on this thread who still think he’s the messiah.

But I did read post after post when he was appointed about how he would tighten things up, make the players do this that and the other and generally, we were saved.

We aren’t saved by a long way.

All I’m saying is, going by the maths, we’re down.

[alcazar]

Shuffled the team again.
Different setup again.

But same old same old.
Now two draws and three defeats.
Maybe this guy ain’t the answer some on here thought he was?

Our present form, if it continues, will see us finish with 33 points.
Do teams stay up with that number?
Dho STILL thinks we can escape?
Because I don’t

I might break my promise in May to go and watch our last ever league game.

[alcazar]

cokeovenkid wrote:

Well they better get their collective finger out because I’ve paid for a ticket for tomorrow’s game, last chance saloon.

Optimism?
Or masochism?

[alcazar]

inspector wrote:

It is true. There may be hope. The Swanns need help.

No.
They need to be gone.

[alcazar]

So…. let’s stick to players who we know either can’t or won’t?

Or take a chance and give some others chance to make a difference?

1 user thanked author for this post.

bartonscorpion

[alcazar]

He responded aggressively.
That’s a yellow in today’s girly football.

[alcazar]

See, this is snother mystery.
When Hill was touted as coming, those in the know on here seemed to be saying he’d favour Pugh over the loanees and that Wilson would surely get some game time.
Indtead we are back with the same set of players, seemingly different formats every week, but much the same set of results.
What has actually changed?

[alcazar]

Oh, I imagine he’s there.
He might do a Holloway yet.

[alcazar]

Muahahaha.
Aye.
Right.
Another Swann promise?

[alcazar]

And I wonder which total lunatic sanctioned that clause?

[alcazar]

Nah.
You’re all wrong.
Apparently Hill will solve every problem, probably including Covid and climate change, and those of us who have been trying to get others to see the problems at the club have no right to point out the problems because…. we don’t attend games.

[alcazar]

ironking wrote:

Interesting exchange chaps!

Humerous though.

Yes, but ‘armless.

[alcazar]

open hearth iron wrote:

Why? Cant be based on anything you have seen can it you make a big thing of the fact you don’t attend

LOL, so those who don’t attend know nowt, then?
Or do we just have no right to say owt?

Either way, you’re talking bollox.

[alcazar]

So much optimism on here.
Pity it’s just wishful thinking.

[alcazar]

Awaywego wrote:

But today is Thursday so he would be telling the truth,wheres the problem in that.

Aye, but he’s “been wrong”, lol, so many times, I’d have to go and check.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe

[alcazar]

Awaywego wrote:

Interesting article on Grimsby telegraph by the owner of the cods, wanting financial regulations to be brought in the national League, he said this year they will make a significant loss (with 6000 crowds) just tells you what the wage structure is down there, and people don’t believe swanny when he said we need 3000 to make ends meet.

I wouldn’t believe Swanny if he told me today is Thursday.

[alcazar]

Been saying the same all season.
At least we’ll have some new grounds to go to.

EVEN IF NOWT HAPPENS WITH OURS YET AGAIN, EH, SWANNY?

[alcazar]

Nice post Tosserien

2 users thanked author for this post.

TwoWrights, mistertonmick

[alcazar]

Iron-awe wrote:

open hearth iron wrote:

Who does alcy support ?

I’ve heard he’s propped up the bar quite a few times over the last fifty years.

Longer than that.

2 users thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe, open hearth iron

[alcazar]

Heath wrote:

“You never did credit me”.

So you just proved the point I was making!

LOL, if you like.
Just admit I was right, you were wrong and you can then start to get over it.

It’ll make you feel better and you can stop peddling cr@p to try and nake me look bad.

[alcazar]

Northumbiron wrote:

To be fair there’s nowt else to bank on really!

Well, yes, but I meant he’s optimistic that Hill both can, and will, sort the mess.
I’m not.
I don’t do optimism…been disappointed too many times in my life.

[alcazar]

Heath wrote:

Alcy actually wants us to go down. He values being proven to be right far higher than the future of the club he supposedly supports. He is right that we are on target for 35 points and if correct we will go down. But it’s too early to throw in the towel.

This old chestnut?
You never did credit me that I was right about Swann very early on, when saying what I did brought condemnation, derision and abuse.

Now you’re trying to peddle the idea that, because you don’t like what I’m saying, I’m somehow less of a supporter than you.

Give it up, mate.
Just apologise and move on.🙂

[alcazar]

Ferrite wrote:

mistertonmick wrote:

Migrants don’t have much difficulty NI.

Didn’t have you down as one of those types Mick.

And if you mean “being rescued after weeks or months of dangerous & uncertain travel” is “not much difficulty”, then I’m not going on holiday with you!

The travel would be far less dangerous and uncertain if they headed towards some of their richer neighbours.

[alcazar]

WG, you really are banking on Hill aren’t you?

I hope you’re right.
I think you’re wrong.

[alcazar]

So Pugh starts on the bench and Wilson can’t even make that.

1-1, with less possession at home and 1/3 of the shots on target that the opposition managed.
And it’s not like they were a top side.
Plus ca change, plus c’est le meme chose.
A point at home isn’t enough.
Going down.

[alcazar]

A pint?
I’ll have shares in his brewery.

0-2, Salford to score two in the last quarter of an hour.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe

[Author]

Posts