“Undisclosed fee”

[Ferrite]

I thought we might have left those days behind with a change in ownership but apparently not.

[64]

I’d love to know why it exists

[Ben]

Normally its so the buying club are not criticised for paying what would be seen by some as too higher fee or the selling club selling at too lower fee.

I just hope we have structured a few add-ons (first team appearances, Hulls potential promotion to the Premier League etc etc).

[Iron-awe]

Seems the shadow of Swann still hangs over us, undisclosed my arse.

[Deereyme66]

Which players have been bought and sold for this fabled fee?

[Anonymous]

Should be written in to the FFP rules that all fees are disclosed.

Open, honest… transparent.

Undisclosed = fans excluded

1 user thanked author for this post.

Ferrite

[TheJuryeffsOut]

Looks like that’s the fee for Foster.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Deereyme66

[lesgeo]

A lot of sense written here.
It’s not just us, though. I would think that a majority of smaller clubs are doing this.

[Sanfran49]

Sometimes to protect the selling club. Where clubs sell cheap to get rid.

[Pat O’Cake]

Undisclosed transfer fees are the norm nowadays but some will choose any topic to have pop at the club they say they support.

[Northumbiron]

It’ll all be clear once the accounts are published!

[cassidystash]

Fee not important, it won’t be much (3rd choice keeper at NLN club?) What could be important are the sell on details if Foster progresses as we all hope.

[Author]

Posts