Truss spewing crap for morons to repeat

[64]

what a load of crap she spouts. It took her a week to finally come out of hiding then got her stupid ideals firmly shoved back at her. Hilarious to hear presenters who don’t have to snivel around,Tory Laura K for instance, the corridors of power ask her difficult questions.
Liz Truss rattling on about slices of pie while being humiliated by local radio was laughable These last few years the rich have widened the wealth gap, while the Tories scream greed at unions who are trying to narrow the gap for the members.
It’s hilarious to think it was the Paedo prince’s press guy who sent her to the slaughter,calculating that local presenters will be a push over, the moment she forgot I numbers, I went looking for the thicko memes, not one I saw . Unlike Dianne abbot who only forgot a number once and was pilloried for ever,I wonder why

[Siderite]

Thick Lizzy regularly trends.

[Iron-awe]

She’s a liar, her predecessor was a liar, his predecessor was a weak incompetent and her predecessor was a two faced coward. Gone well the last twelve years hasn’t it.

[Bucksiron]

Not that any of you would hurl abuse around, of course. Such well constructed arguments.

[Siderite]

I should add that my point was to prove 64 wrong aboutsuch tags being one sided. I wasn’t saying it was good.

Yet, because I am to the left of Reagan I must be sinister. Yawn.

[64]

“a little turbulence”

[64]

Bucksiron wrote:

Not that any of you would hurl abuse around, of course. Such well constructed arguments.

yeah but right ,hence you being unable to disprove it

[64]

Bucksiron wrote:

Not that any of you would hurl abuse around, of course. Such well constructed arguments.

yeah but right ,hence you being unable to disprove it

[Iron-awe]

Bucksiron wrote:

Not that any of you would hurl abuse around, of course. Such well constructed arguments.

Surely you don’t need a history rerun to remind you how disastrous the premierships of Cameron, May, Johnson and the first three weeks of Truss have been, it’s there for all to see, please keep up.

[Heath]

“Not that any of you would hurl abuse around, of course”.

Tosser!!

There, I would.

1 user thanked author for this post.

open hearth iron

[Northumbiron]

2 users thanked author for this post.

TwoWrights, Heath

[Siderite]

This board got closed down because of alcazar and Big J.

[Deereyme66]

I see Braverman and Clarke are suggesting some of their own Party, including Gove, staged a coup against Truss and Kwarteng regarding the ‘mini-budget’. Of course it’s fantastic that this bunch of miscreants are united in governing the country out of the mess they created for millions, instead of spending yet more time on in-fighting, but perhaps a lot of this could have been avoided if they’d shared their plans with the Cabinet first, who may have told them they were heading for trouble? And before anyone attempts whataboutery regarding Labour; they’re not governing the country, so it’s irrelevant.

[Siderite]

Siderite wrote:

This board got closed down because of alcazar and Big J.

This was in response to a Bucks post. I am surprised that post got removed. I don’t recall anything untoward in it.

[Deereyme66]

Your post makes more sense now Siderite.

[Northumbiron]

Deereyme66 wrote:

perhaps a lot of this could have been avoided if they’d shared their plans with the Cabinet first

Perhaps it could have been avoided if the party had elected a competent leader instead of just another bumbling cartoon character.

[Bucksiron]

Heavens, NI, talk about pot, kettle and black. Corbyn was a joke and Starmer supported him, along with most Labour MPs, you and the rest of the usual suspects on here.

As for Truss, let’s wait to see what happens over the next 12 months. Who knows, you might be right but I wouldn’t bet your house on it. Polls can move either way and clearly very quickly in these febrile times.

[Siderite]

Trust is also hard to regain, and watching her recently, do you seriously think she can improve her image? There was good reason Tories were happy with Corbyn as Labour leader from the off, Tories should do the same with Truss. If they want to kid themselves into thinking it looks good with Truss, I am more than happy, from a non-Tory perspective.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Heath

[Heath]

Bucks obviously voted for her.

Wrong again!!!

[Northumbiron]

Bucksiron wrote:

Heavens, NI, talk about pot, kettle and black. Corbyn was a joke and Starmer supported him, along with most Labour MPs, you and the rest of the usual suspects on here.

Nice bit of whataboutery there Bucks. That didn’t take long to surface did it?

The Labour leaders you name were just that, leaders of the opposition.

What we are dealing with here is not a parish councillor, nor the chairman of the tennis club. Not even a member of the opposition.

This person is the Prime Minister. Just let that sink in for a minute…..

….that’s right, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

No member of the public from those four home nations voted for her. She was elected to the post by members of the Tory Party, several of whom are already beginning to question their decision.

Do you really think Ms Truss (or, indeed, Mr Johnson before her) is the best person to hold what is the most important position in government?

Do we really want another “let’s wait and see” moment?

I remember three years ago on this board some posters were saying “Boris will do for me”. “Let’s see how it goes”.

Well we know how that ended up, don’t we?

The country can’t afford another useless PM.

2 users thanked author for this post.

Gurnelista, Heath

[Deereyme66]

And now she’s blocked a public information campaign that was nearly ready to launch encouraging people to save energy. What an idiot!

[64]

” Starmer supported him, along with most Labour MPs, you and the rest of the usual suspects on here.” that’s a lie, Labour MP’s went against the membership and used their Murdoch creds to get the press onside with a smear campaign that outstripped any in history..That’s a fact , proven in numbers of anti Corbyn stories and memes, and amout of MP’s that voted against his leadership bid .So to claim that Starmer backed him is ridiculous. The Tories have surrendered the next election to appease old men and women who haven’t a clue about modern economics and how the world runs now,it’s a form of self harm. I bet labour can’t believe their luck, winning with Starmer in charge is like winning Masterchef with a Pot noodle

1 user thanked author for this post.

Gurnelista

[Siderite]

“Any other leader would be 20 points ahead by now.”

Meanwhile Saint Jeremy led Labour to its worst election result in decades. Oh yeah, it’s someone else’s fault (it always is). If Starmer is a pot noodle, Corbyn is poisoned spam.

[Gurnelista]

Thick Lizzie Trickle has lost control of her cabinet, the economy and the pound. Trust has gone, the government is at war and focussed entirely on itself. Now, their main political aim is damage limitation, with knives sharpened for a bloodbath of blame.

It’s hard to understand how BI is processing all this – the way the party has collapsed and crumbled to the point where the Tories are finished. It must be hard to do unless Stockholm Syndrome has deadened his response, and that’s why after 12 years of government incompetence the only defence is with arguments that are bizarre, misleading and unsupported by evidence.

But for those who vote for the blue lot ‘religiously’ i.e. without thinking, there is a question they should ask, which is ‘just what has happened to the Conservative Party, how on earth did it come to this?’

[Bucksiron]

Let’s see what happens, Gurny. I recall you claiming the Tories were finished not long before the last election.

As for “religiously” voting for them, I wouldn’t expect you to come out with anything remotely constructive because that word doesn’t appear in your vocabulary. It’s always the same from you, painting people in the way you see them, no doubt as a result of your ‘psychological profiling’. Then you come out with a comment such as “arguments that are bizarre, misleading and unsupported by evidence”. It’s all complete tosh.

[64]

Anyway ,your party has crashed the economy ,their gods or the market rejected their mini budget.The Bank of England had to bail them out costing people the chance to buy homes and some mortgage owners £500 a year,this happened as soon as that reckless Blue rinser payback budget was dropped.It had nothing to do with world events.Tory dogma sank economy for all to see and gave the next election to Starmer who was struggling to gain support ,one less cynical of him than me would say it’s genius of him .

[Deereyme66]

The large amount of stories and memes criticising Corbyn, and the amount of MP’s that voted against his leadership bid proves that he’d become hugely unpopular with a large swathe of Labour politicians and the public. Whether or not you believe there was a conspiracy against him from Party colleagues and the media is your opinion but it’s not fact. Neither is saying the Tories have handed the next election to Starmer. But I’m sure there’s plenty of Labour supporters and members that would prefer him to fail so they can stick the boot in, as evidenced by the amount of tedious anti-Starmer content on social media. Ideologues on the hard right and ideologues on the hard left who arrogantly insist it’s their choice alone to decide if it should still be called the ‘Labour Party’ because it isn’t socialist enough for them. Times change. Personally, I and many other Party members are prepared to evolve for the greater good of getting the Tories out of power.

[Siderite]

An interesting article, and not from a left wing source or journalist before it can be dismissed as that, suggesting it is unlikely approval ratings for Truss will recover, regardless of any economic upturn:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/can-truss-ever-repair-the-damage-of-her-first-four-weeks-

There are elements I disagree with, but it’s a worthwhile piece, nevertheless.

[Bucksiron]

I don’t agree. “It’s the economy, stupid” is famous for a reason and it very much depends on what happens over the next 12 to 18 months. Also worth remembering that higher interest rates are good for savers, a group of people everyone appears to have forgotten about.

Remember what happened in 1992. Nobody gave John Major a cat-in-hell’s chance of winning, but he did.

[Siderite]

Disagree all you want, but the economy improved after black Wednesday,but Major still lost afterwards, with that being a pivotal moment of confidence loss. The charts of approval rating show every PM declining in approval rating. Truss is already lower than every former PM. It would take a brave person to pin hopes on hypothetical and rare rises in popularity.

The economic argument failed in 2016 for the US election and Brexit referendum.

[Author]

Posts