Too many subs

[64]

Awful defending again, and too many subs loses any traction we have creating more problems for these awful defenders

[Awaywego]

With you again 64 should have been an easy win but piss pure defending nearly cost us again.
To many subs that weren’t needed imo.

[Deereyme66]

Not the impression I got from the commentary. Brought Beck on and he scored and I thought the last two were to break up Brackley’s momentum and see the game out?

2 users thanked author for this post.

ironfromafar, Iron-awe

[Iron-awe]

Both goals were defendable particularly the second but I don’t think the subs were to blame, agree with DM’s synopsis.

[Awaywego]

What like when Evans took that quick free kick in our half and tried a long pass to Uzbekistan was that what was needed, when a cool head was needed far from breaking up Brackleys momentum it came straight back at us.

[Deereyme66]

Then maybe not the idea of the subs at fault but the way some of those subs executed their roles?

[Deereyme66]

It was good to hear Torps saying in the first half that Butler and Schof were imploring the players to increase the tempo and stop the pedestrian play

2 users thanked author for this post.

Awaywego, lesgeo

[ironfromafar]

Iron-awe wrote:

Both goals were defendable particularly the second but I don’t think the subs were to blame, agree with DM’s synopsis.

Their second was offside … very poor officials by the sound ov it.

[lesgeo]

Yes, IFA – but how legit was Max’s goal?

[Awaywego]

Max’s goal was fine he was stood behind the goal line when the ball was crossed from what I saw.

[BigLeftToe]

Initially thought Max’s goal was going to get chalked off for Boycey being offside…but watching the replay Boyce wasn’t interfering with play and didn’t touch the ball, so perfectly good goal.

[Author]

Posts