Too many subs

[64]

Awful defending again, and too many subs loses any traction we have creating more problems for these awful defenders

[Awaywego]

With you again 64 should have been an easy win but piss pure defending nearly cost us again.
To many subs that weren’t needed imo.

[Deereyme66]

Not the impression I got from the commentary. Brought Beck on and he scored and I thought the last two were to break up Brackley’s momentum and see the game out?

2 users thanked author for this post.

ironfromafar, Iron-awe

[Iron-awe]

Both goals were defendable particularly the second but I don’t think the subs were to blame, agree with DM’s synopsis.

[Awaywego]

What like when Evans took that quick free kick in our half and tried a long pass to Uzbekistan was that what was needed, when a cool head was needed far from breaking up Brackleys momentum it came straight back at us.

[Deereyme66]

Then maybe not the idea of the subs at fault but the way some of those subs executed their roles?

[Deereyme66]

It was good to hear Torps saying in the first half that Butler and Schof were imploring the players to increase the tempo and stop the pedestrian play

[ironfromafar]

Iron-awe wrote:

Both goals were defendable particularly the second but I don’t think the subs were to blame, agree with DM’s synopsis.

Their second was offside … very poor officials by the sound ov it.

[Author]

Posts