THE EMBARGO

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace THE EMBARGO

  • Author
    Posts
  • #230922
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 101

    Any news on new transfers?

    #230924
    Iron-aweIron-awe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 21, 2017
    Topics: 11

    None yet but just to reaffirm its ” shit or bust day ” today.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #230925
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 101

    Don’t mince your words I-A!

    #230927
    alcazaralcazar
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Swann’s the former, the club will be the latter.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #230928
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 104

    As I understand it the EFL embargo limits squad size (anybody know what it is?) It’s likely that we are being held up by lack of movement out and, with the players we’d like to shift, that could be more difficult than attracting players in.

    #230929
    McfarlanewasalegendMcfarlanewasalegend
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 26, 2022
    Topics: 1

    Think its max of 23 players in the squad

    #230932
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 104

    Thanks. Just had a look and, depending on which youngsters count and which don’t I reckon we have 23. Can’t see how we can shift 4 to bring in the 4 that Hill wants. Loanees could be one route, surely the chairman can persuade his mate Rodders to take Wood back.

    #230935
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    Correct me if I am wrong here (I am not an expert), but as the company (SUFC) is a PLC, the company owns the assets. If Mr. Swann is the only (or major) shareholder, he would own the business BUT NOT the assets as he and the PLC are separate legal entities. That’s what a SOLE or GROUP OF SHAREHOLDERS is. He/they own’s the company. THE COMPANY OWN’S THE ASSETS.

    I have no knowledge or real understanding of how the transfer of assets actually happened, but let’s take an example and assume that, as the owner of SUFC PLC, Mr. Swann has overseen the transfer of SUFC PLC assets to Coolsilk in order to pay off incurred “debts”. If Coolsilk is also a PLC (and I haven’t bothered to check) of which Mr. Swann is the sole or major shareholder, that company now own’s the stadium and land – NOT MR. SWANN, they are separate legal entities.

    Therefore, Mr. Swann would NEVER have legally owned the stadium and land!

    #230937
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    Swann has ALWAYS owned the stadium and land. That’s what an OWNER is.

    Correct me if I am wrong here (I am not an expert), but as the company (SUFC) is a PLC, the company owns the assets. If Mr. Swann is the only (or major) shareholder, he would own the business BUT NOT the assets as he and the PLC are separate legal entities. That’s what a SOLE or GROUP OF SHAREHOLDERS is. He/they own’s the company. THE COMPANY OWN’S THE ASSETS.

    I have no knowledge or real understanding of how the transfer of assets actually happened, but let’s take an example and assume that, as the owner of SUFC PLC, Mr. Swann has overseen the transfer of SUFC PLC assets to Coolsilk in order to pay off incurred “debts”. If Coolsilk is also a PLC (and I haven’t bothered to check) of which Mr. Swann is the sole or major shareholder, that company now own’s the stadium and land – NOT MR. SWANN, they are separate legal entities.

    Therefore, Mr. Swann would NEVER have legally owned the stadium and land!

    #230939
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Offline
    Registered On:
    Topics: 11

    Whose company is Coolsilk?

    #230941
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    Whose company is Coolsilk?

    Have a look on Companies House. It should be on there as matter of public knowledge.

    #230945
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Offline
    Registered On:
    Topics: 11

    Ah yes Mr & Mrs Swann. Therefore they own Coolsilk, who own SUFC. It’s been that way since 2013.

    Some are just making a big deal of it now because we’re doing poor in the league.

    #230948
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    Ah yes Mr & Mrs Swann. Therefore they own Coolsilk, who own SUFC. It’s been that way since 2013.

    Some are just making a big deal of it now because we’re doing poor in the league.

    That’s as may be – but they never did and still don’t OWN the stadium or land. They were on the legal entity that is SUFC PLCs asset list. Now I would guess they are on the legal entity that is Coolsik’s asset list.

    #230949
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Offline
    Registered On:
    Topics: 11

    So people are getting upset over pieces of paper that Swann has ultimate control over?

    #230951
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    So people are getting upset over pieces of paper that Swann has ultimate control over?

    Again – that may be the case. But the you have been stating as a matter of fact the Mr.Swann already owned the stadium and land. The actual fact is he didn’t – SUFC PLC did. That is the ONLY point I am trying to make here. Everyone else can have their opinions – to which they are entitled – but I am just trying to provide the correct fact around ownership of a PLCs assets. They are WHOLLY OWNED by the PLC, not the shareholders.

    #230952
    BottesfordIrons5North Lincolnshire Irons
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: September 30, 2017
    Topics: 58

    No! People are upset because of what SWANN has done to Scunthorpe United Football Club, members of the Football League for over 70 years. Then new boy SWANN comes in and look where we are now, barring a miracle ready to drop out of the football league. Its not about pieces of paper, but supporters are entitled to know exactly what SWANN has done and is doing with our Club, after all he is always harping on about fans money through the turnstiles.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #230953
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Offline
    Registered On:
    Topics: 11

    Ok you are being pedantic. The Swanns have had CONTROL of everything since 2013 regardless of what a piece of paper says.

    #230955
    HeckIronHeckIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 13, 2021
    Topics: 0

    Ok you are being pedantic. The Swanns have had CONTROL of everything since 2013 regardless of what a piece of paper says.

    You are correct – I am being pedantic, but this is because I would prefer people to be basing opinions on fact. If I am the sole shareholder of a PLC (even if I set up the PLC in the first place) and in order to do my work, I use PLC funds to buy me a laptop for example, that laptop belongs to the PLC and not me. Should I then want to sell all of my shares in the PLC, the laptop will be used as an asset when assessing the value of those shares. The new “owner” will own the PLC – the assets continue to be owned by the PLC. If my company goes in to liquidation, those assets will be considered when it comes to selling assets off to pay debt. If those assets have already been transferred, my company is much less valuable to either a prospective purchaser or a liquidator. Those are facts.

    #230956
    BigLeftToeBigLeftToe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 6, 2017
    Topics: 6

    Any news on new transfers?

    Blackpool Gazette are reporting that Nuttall is still due to sign for us by the end of the day.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #230958
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 101

    Fingers crossed then. No news on a CB though?

    #230961
    BottesfordIrons5North Lincolnshire Irons
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: September 30, 2017
    Topics: 58

    Just heard Matt Dean on Radio. He said we’re hoping to sign Nuttall but can’t sign anyone until someone leaves. This is where SWANN has taken us. Depths of despair. I bet Keith Hill is tearing his hair out.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #230962
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Offline
    Registered On:
    Topics: 11

    NLI can you update us on Swanns and SUFC financial situation, you seem clued up on how much money each has had available over the last couple of years? Much appreciated.

    #230963
    Iron-aweIron-awe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 21, 2017
    Topics: 11

    If Swann and his son left could we sign two more players 🤔

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #230964
    NorthumbironNorthumbiron
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: January 3, 2014
    Topics: 66

    It would certainly seem like the recruitment “committee” are surplus to requirements!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #230965
    BarnardFoxtonBarker..BarnardFoxtonBarker..
    Participant
    Online
    Registered On: June 28, 2017
    Topics: 0

    If this is true why have we brought in players in midfield/fullback positions when Forwards/central defenders are what we need the most. Something doesn’t add up.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #230966
    BottesfordIrons5North Lincolnshire Irons
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: September 30, 2017
    Topics: 58

    You’re absolutely right BarnardFoxtonBarker. If it’s right what Matt Dean has said why have we signed three midfielders and no striker apart from Burns on loan. And we desperately need a centre-back. Just doesn’t make sense. Let’s hope other clubs want two of our players.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #230968
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 104

    Looks like paying off the EFL loan will be “necessary” in order to remove the squad size limit and get Hill the players he wants.

    #230969
    TwoWrightsTwoWrights
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 4

    Rumour I heard is that in the summer this EFL loan becomes a grant, and then doesn’t need to be repaid.

    #230971
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 101

    Though from what I can tell, we really did need the lightweight midfield boosting up.

    #230973
    alcazaralcazar
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Why would anyone want the players we need shut of? Are Billy Smarts or Chipperfields in town and in need of clowns?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.