- This topic has 55 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
4 users thanked author for this post.
I never believe a word the Prawn says, if the day ever dawn’s we are sold and he’s gone and we still have a football club, will be the only time I believe but a lot of us may be dead by then.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Dying Swan, that’s ballet for ya.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Swan fake
4 users thanked author for this post.
I have not seen any concrete proff any buyers or a potential sale takeover call it what you like exsisited …im.tendiing to go down the bullshit route to sell season tickets ..until.of course any proof does appear
2 users thanked author for this post.
I reckon it was a deflection like the times we were told about new stands etc under Steve Wharton.
Back of a fag packet design that most knew would never be built, but it stopped us talking about directors who contributed nothing but took plenty, or the latest player sold quickly and far too cheap.As for Swann, if he told me today was Wednesday, I’d have to check.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bru bought into it though.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bru reported it and discussed it on the podcast but they have to work with what info they receive. Of course they would not say whether they believe it or not or any more snippets of info from you know who would stop completely. Remember any info from Bru or LT is only repeated from the same source a lot of us question.
1 user thanked author for this post.
There have been 4 or 5 interested groups so far depending who you believe. I think Swann has referenced 4 of them but of course that is no guarantee of truth.
For a club hanging on at the arse end of full time professional football that seems a high number and definitely suggests the interest is certainly there.
It is only my opinion but it also suggests the asking price is too high or that the strings attached too onerous.
1 user thanked author for this post.
To MK Iron. To answer all your questions – who says ?
Yes THE EGO !
1 user thanked author for this post.
Like I say MK they never contradicted Swannys statement, in fact they never said a darn thing. Would be more than willing to hear their side if different.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Maybe they read the statement and thought, ” give it up, we are dealing with a fruitcake hear “.
1 user thanked author for this post.
So Swanny can publish or say what he wants with impunity? Yet others have their hands tied by confidentiality agreement, By he’s a powerful man why would we want rid, so clever than everyone else a messiah.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I suspect the asking price is too high. In my opinion Swann has destroyed a lot of the intangible asset value of the club, which is only likely to come back if we can show signs of returning the the EFL. That looks a long way off at the moment.
All very demoralising for supporters.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I suspect the asking price is too high. In my opinion Swann has destroyed a lot of the intangible asset value of the club, which is only likely to come back if we can show signs of returning the the EFL. That looks a long way off at the moment.
Pretty much anything can be sold if the asking price is right. Conversely, if you can’t sell something, it is often because the price is too high.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The reality is that none of us know what is happening.
Even with nda’s/conf agreements, there would be nothing to stop either party making a basic statement like Swann has. No detail, nothing controversial, just a general statement.
What I find hard to take is all these poster who moan when Swann doesn’t say anything yet shout “liar” as soon as he opens his mouth. It is getting tedious.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.