- This topic has 86 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 16 hours, 40 minutes ago by
.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
I think he just likes the attention whether it be fund raising hero the couldn’t care less villain or the mental health sufferer, maybe just ignore him and give any funds you want to give to the club through the Iron Trust, which is the only sensible serious thing to do IMO.
1 user thanked author for this post.
He would make a good few quid if he sold his own effigy, only thing missing is an halo.
Just realised ‘Ramus Twat’ is an anagram of Stuart Maw!
Just saying.
So is Smut Waart, it’s those pictures again, lol.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Just realised ‘Ramus Twat’ is an anagram of Stuart Maw!
Just saying.
So is: A Mr SU twat
1 user thanked author for this post.
He would make a good few quid if he sold his own effigy, only thing missing is an halo.
Think it’s at the rear… lol
I don’t know either Jerry or Stuart personally but clearly they are massive Iron fans. Can we accept that, stop the unnecessary sniping and just concentrate on the football. Thank you. UTI.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Well said cass, this would probably happen if they both kept their derogatory traps shut on certain matters concerning people like the Iron Trust. PS bet that doesn’t happen.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I don’t know either Jerry or Stuart personally but clearly they are massive Iron fans. Can we accept that, stop the unnecessary sniping and just concentrate on the football. Thank you. UTI.
I think sometimes humour is missed. Sometimes a joke is made because there’s a joke that can be made. The humour is sometimes in the technique or mechanics, sometimes in the ridiculousness – and in those instances the subject matter of the joke is almost secondary to the making of the joke.
But in general, I agree.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Shariabang to Skeggy … whose funding it ??
Who are you Tommy Robinson?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Honestly don’t you believe Stu deserves criticism over ticketgate
I’d imagine he’ll be quite embarrassed when and if he reflects on it. If not, then that’s what might deserve the criticism.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I remember the dickhead describing me as vermin on Twitter when he had his tongue firmly up Hiltons rear end, he constantly sniped at myself and two others that led to doxing and death threats by burner accounts.
When the dirty old man was caught requesting nude pictures of young girls he went into hiding after initially denying it.
So yes he is fair game and deserves all the shite that gets thrown his way.
He’s an attention seeker, no more, no less.2 users thanked author for this post.
Cass you are usually the voice of reason, but the toxic twosome, are often the protagonists by spitting venom first.
People will give it back, Ramus is getting off lightly regarding a liking for younger ladies, which he lied about despite being caught with his pants down (metaphorically speaking of course).
The defence of WHAM was non too clever either. Nor was attacking fellow fans with an alternative opinion about said person.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.