Iron Bru › Forums › Blast Furnace › Peter Swanns Statement
- This topic has 20 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 3 months ago by BobbyGmeister.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 24, 2023 at 1:04 pm #273332
In light of all the rumours, Facebook statements and general craziness surrounding Scunthorpe United can anyone point me in the direction of Swanns statement that he posted on here as I’d like to reread it if it is still available.
1 user thanked author for this post.
September 24, 2023 at 1:33 pm #273337September 24, 2023 at 2:43 pm #273345Thanks, makes interesting reading in light of what is going on.
September 24, 2023 at 3:04 pm #273346What we need now is a reply now from Swann regarding these latest posts from Hilton. I definitely don’t trust Hilton whatsoever. Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
September 24, 2023 at 3:04 pm #273347What have you deduced from the statement?
September 24, 2023 at 3:15 pm #273349What we need now is a reply now from Swann regarding these latest posts from Hilton. I definitely don’t trust Hilton whatsoever. Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
I can’t see many people trusting Swann’s response, and I think the ship has sailed in Swann escaping blame in our plight. The question is how much will blame will Hilton take too?
1 user thanked author for this post.
September 24, 2023 at 3:21 pm #273350As has been said many times before there is only ONE person to blame for the state of SUFC
September 24, 2023 at 3:51 pm #273351Totally agree that one man is to blame for where we all are. However that doesn’t mean we are currently getting the truth from the new fella.
1 user thanked author for this post.
September 24, 2023 at 4:26 pm #273358There was one person to blame for where we were last year. Now there are two.
3 users thanked author for this post.
September 24, 2023 at 9:40 pm #273380Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
September 25, 2023 at 12:33 am #273384Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
I’m no Swann supporter, but at least get your facts right
Swann transferred assets over to his company in return for writing off £11,000,000.
I accept that he, and his managers, were absolutely crap with the use of the money over a long period, but he could have let us keep the assets and the £11M debt. We would have been much worse off than we are now.
1 user thanked author for this post.
September 25, 2023 at 7:47 am #273391Swanns desperation to sell led to the appointment of Hilton so you could argue he is even more culpable both through lacking a watertight sale of the ground+ land and due dilegence of the new owner .
September 25, 2023 at 8:22 am #273392Appointment of Hilton,he wasn’t appointed, he bought it for a token gesture
September 25, 2023 at 10:25 am #273396Swanns desperation to sell led to the appointment of Hilton so you could argue he is even more culpable both through lacking a watertight sale of the ground+ land and due dilegence of the new owner .
If you go down that route we should blame Wharton for selling out to Swann……
2 users thanked author for this post.
September 25, 2023 at 4:09 pm #273444“The lease he issued himself does not constitute a security of tenure required by the National League or the FA. We have made this point very clear to the National League alongside many other ongoing major issues, however they have refused to work with us or even communicate with us properly to discuss these concerns.” PS.
Anyone know why the NL and FA might be uninterested in these matters?
September 25, 2023 at 4:23 pm #273449Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
I’m no Swann supporter, but at least get your facts right
Swann transferred assets over to his company in return for writing off £11,000,000.
I accept that he, and his managers, were absolutely crap with the use of the money over a long period, but he could have let us keep the assets and the £11M debt. We would have been much worse off than we are now.
On a Radio Humberside interview the EGO said we had gambled but failed.
That is factually incorrect – HE had gambled, we had no say in it. In fact no one had. So who sanctioned the spending season after season that then totaled into the debt of £11 Million – The Chairman had. Yet the club who had no so say in it has to repay its money to the person who spent it !!
2 users thanked author for this post.
September 25, 2023 at 6:02 pm #273459Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
I’m no Swann supporter, but at least get your facts right
Swann transferred assets over to his company in return for writing off £11,000,000.
I accept that he, and his managers, were absolutely crap with the use of the money over a long period, but he could have let us keep the assets and the £11M debt. We would have been much worse off than we are now.
On a Radio Humberside interview the EGO said we had gambled but failed.
That is factually incorrect – HE had gambled, we had no say in it. In fact no one had. So who sanctioned the spending season after season that then totaled into the debt of £11 Million – The Chairman had. Yet the club who had no so say in it has to repay its money to the person who spent it !!
It was a gamble, and a bad one. Far too many clubs are doing the same, with dubious owners and no Plan B.
Many of us were not complaining about money being spent in the first few years as we hope for success and promotion. Disaster struck when we failed.
As the owner, Swann could do what he liked, and he did. He even found a mug to buy the club, unfortunately it seems to be that it is another bad ‘un. We shall find out for certain very soon……
2 users thanked author for this post.
September 25, 2023 at 7:24 pm #273474Well if nothing else it’s kept Swanny dangling for 9 months and counting.
September 26, 2023 at 11:22 am #273561“The lease he issued himself does not constitute a security of tenure required by the National League or the FA. We have made this point very clear to the National League alongside many other ongoing major issues, however they have refused to work with us or even communicate with us properly to discuss these concerns.” PS.
Anyone know why the NL and FA might be uninterested in these matters?
Presumably because the league tries to have rules in place to avoid clubs disappearing mid-season or moving grounds. The last few seasons in the National League have seen a couple of sides fail to complete the season and they would have been keen to avoid that happening again in our case. Of course, why the league would correspond with Swann at this stage is a different matter.
September 26, 2023 at 11:28 am #273563I’d hope Mr Swann does issue ,even on here , another statement. I think we need something
September 26, 2023 at 2:51 pm #273599If you go down that route we should blame Wharton for selling out to Swann……
Are you for real?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.