- This topic has 55 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
only if it was Man United, that would be funny
1 user thanked author for this post.
Aside from genuine Chelsea fans.
3 users thanked author for this post.
All the owners of Man United have done is badly mismanaged the football side of the business whilst creaming off the profits. Oh and without ever using a dollar of their own money.
Pretty wholesome as owners of Premier League clubs go.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Probably not directly Mick.
No but Newcastle owners have and LFC supporters have,
1 user thanked author for this post.
This has come far too late, he should never have been allowed to buy Chelsea in the first place. A read on how he gained his wealth is particularly eye-opening.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bring an end to all foreign owners. Take it your happy with the murderous Newcastle owners Mick, now they have a f ING good laugh beheading and crucifying, remind us of what man utd owners have done.
I couldn’t care less if the owner is foreign. I do care if they’re members of a human rights abusing state looking to use football to whitewash this. :-) Chelsea, Man City, Newcastle and PSG are all like this and football has turned a blind eye for greed for too long. :-)
Linked doesn’t mean they have killed anybody, also has the Newcastle owners personally killed anybody
How many people do you think Hitler & Stalin killed with the bear hands? Just because they didn’t pull the trigger doesn’t mean that their reputations are spotless!
4 users thanked author for this post.
“Linked doesn’t mean they have killed anybody,”
I guess that Chelsea’s owners support ok then. :-) I don’t think it’s a good argument to say that it’s ok for owners to directly support mass murder, so long as they don’t do it themselves.
” also has the Newcastle owners personally killed anybody”
Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund, which is directly linked to the regime, own 80% of the club. That regime have most definitely been linked to ordering deaths. :-)
2 users thanked author for this post.
The Saudi PIF have been highly linked with funding the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. :-)
And why is direct link to murder the only suitable barrier for ownership? I wouldn’t be happy if Scunthorpe Utd was bought buy people linked to an organisation or country heavily linked with atrocities. :-)
4 users thanked author for this post.
As soon as the Premier League was formed back in the nineties it was all about money and how much the big league could make be it through tv deals, big sponsorship, marketing etc etc. It was only a matter of time when billionaires would see the potential the Premier League was providing to make more money, possibly even launder dirty money in the process, that made owning one of the more desirable clubs attractive. The game has only itself to blame for allowing these people into our game ( our game, the people’s game ) in the first place. The game went down the greedy bastards route and now we wring our hands in despair because of the tarnished reputation these owners have brought to our national sport through their dodgy reputations.
The game has got what it deserved.Makes you glad that we have an owner like Swannsky.
If you remove the letter “s” you have a more appropriate title I believe.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Can’t see that happening, it’s totally unfair on the fans but I wish the bloody war was over and we can get back to something like normal and countries rally round to help Ukraine in what seems a pointless attack from Russia to me
2 users thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.