Matt Hancock

[64]

Man gives secrets to journalist who disagrees with his big scheme and cries when she blabs,what a Tory clown

[Heath]

Hancock is crying that there is “absolutely no public interest case for this huge breach”, and describes it as a “massive betrayal”.

Not as big a betrayal as to those who had family members die in social care because Hancock DIDN’T put his “arm around them”.

It was Hancock who decided to seek publicity in the jungle, who oversaw the corrupt fast lane, who clearly craves to be a media star and couldn’t wait to release his book to profiteer on the deaths of so many.

It was thicko Hancock who chose a writer with a record of “betrayals”, a writer who is a partner of the Reform group leader, who has an agenda against the lockdowns.

Was he so stupid not to ask why she didn’t want paying to write the book?

With his over inflated ego, he probably concluded that she was desperate to work with and be associated with the big …cock!!

[Deereyme66]

That last paragraph could be interpreted two ways. They’re a grubby little pair aren’t they. Kind of deserve each other on an island somewhere. Preferably not this one.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Heath

[Deereyme66]

Just realised you’ve got a new avatar 64. Can you get that on a poster or T shirt aswell?

[Siderite]

How many more times if Oakenshott going to betray her sources before they never trust her again?

[Siderite]

is, not if.

[Heath]

Hopefully never again.

[Author]

Posts