Maidenhead

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace Maidenhead

  • Author
    Posts
  • #242635
    cliffbyrnesrightpegCliff Byrne’s Right Peg
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 17, 2015
    Topics: 57

    Taft worries me and got caught out several times

    Taft was also shaky against Yeovil at times. Definitely need another CB. Daniel doesn’t want to be starting there either, Hill wants to be going with Wilson until we get another wide player in the building.

    Daniel’s a LB playing LW and he looks like one too. We need 2 strikers up there as well. If taft keeps playing like he is, I wouldn’t be against giving Ethan Young a go, doubt he’d be any more shaky.

    Don’t want to single players out early but he got away with a few errors At Yeovil, hopefully he can settle down next to Boyce but I remain to convinced he won’t cost us a lot of points this year.

    Another Centre back is a must

    #242637
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 108

    Daniel’s a LB playing LW and he looks like one too. We need 2 strikers up there as well.
    [/quote]

    Daniel is a utility player – invaluable at this level. He played up front once and scored 2 don’t forget.

    #242638
    BigLeftToeBigLeftToe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 6, 2017
    Topics: 6

    Daniel was playing right wing yesterday and was abysmal.

    Agree with the above in that Taft is a complete liability, we definitely need another centre back.

    Ogle was our best player, a proper full back who looks rapid going forwards and decent enough defensively. Complete contrast to O’Malley who can’t defend for toffee and looks terrified to go forward.

    Nuttall played well, he needs support and I liked the way Carver baffled for everything when he came on. We should be playing 4-4-2 but if that becomes our preferred formation then we need wingers in the building pronto.

    Shocking defending cost us yesterday but we could have quite easily come away with a point after the chances we had in the 2nd half. That wouldn’t have happened last season and we probably would have crumbled 5-0 so there’s at least that positive to take away from the game.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #242639
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 91

    Daniel is a utility player – invaluable at this level. He played up front once and scored 2 don’t forget

    No doubting he’ll be valuable due to the fact he’s versatile and can cover when needed. I just rather him not play out on the wing as a first pick, he doesn’t look right out there.

    Wilson would be my pick personally for the time being. I’ll give Taft more time but he needs to tighten up sharpish if we’re not to ship goals for fun.

    Opening 2 games for Taft and he’s bordering on being a liability already…he seriously needs to wake up

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #242645
    ironkingironking
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 8, 2014
    Topics: 74

    Maidenhead played the ball on the floor and ran at our defence pinpointing Taft and O’Malley in particular. They scored with their first two attacks putting the ball in the six yard box exactly where goals are scored.

    Two of their goals were scored on the goal line far too simply.

    We had a lot of good chances hitting the bar and post as well as scoring a well placed penalty and a classic header into the box from a good cross.

    The worry for me was how often we pumped the ball high and long for Nutall.

    We should learn from Maidenhead who played the ball through the channels and on the ground.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #242648
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 91

    Funny you mentioned O’Malley, he’s promising going forward and has fantastic delivery in to the box but positionally at times he get’s dragged all over the place and tends to switch off.

    There’s a fantastic player in there as he’s got a lot of ability but said last season he’d probably be more comfortable playing out on the wing. I wouldn’t be against putting Daniel at the back in LB slot and try O’Malley LW.

    O’Malley’s got a brilliant cross on him, good pace and like to bomb forward when given the chance. Nthle and Daniel could play LB.

    Granted O’Malley is much more polished than young Lewis but I get a similar vibe watching Lewis playing LB as I do O’Malley…he’s another one who’s much better going forward.

    We lack options out wide at the moment, why not give O’Malley a game or two out wide and see how he does ?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #242651
    ironkingironking
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 8, 2014
    Topics: 74

    Another trait of O’Malleys game is that he gets himself into a good forward position and instead of crossing low and hard or high into the six yard box he plays the ball behind him on the diagonal.

    Through this we often find ourselves losing the ball. He then leaves himself out of position and too far behind play.

    This exposes Taft who is prone to switching off and making mistakes.

    If I have spotted it scouts will have too. The answer of course is to hit the cross as Maidenhead did because it puts teams under pressure and they concede goals or corners.

    Lewis is not a left back and Daniel is not a forward (he is totally lost in the position).

    We need to iron out these basic errors. Use the channels and play the ball low and hard. I would be looking to wake Taft up quickly or sign another centre half.

    #242654
    FerriteFerrite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 102

    Not sure why Taft is getting all the blame on here when, watching the highlights, Boyce looks equally to blame for the second goal in particular. O’Malley has always looked very suspect when defending, hopefully a good coach will be able to improve that side of the game.

    On the upside, Nuttall actually looked like a striker and we did respond in the second half. Not all bad.

    #242657
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 108

    Let me throw another name into the mix without lessening the blame on Boyce and Taft. Could Dewhurst have claimed the ball before the opposition players for the first two?
    Both well inside the 6 yard box.

    #242658
    BigLeftToeBigLeftToe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 6, 2017
    Topics: 6

    I’ve never understood the “O’Malley is good going forwards” comment. He’s got a great cross but when in possession with no space in front of him he always looks absolutely terrified and plays the ball backwards. I’ve never seen him take on a man or bomb forward on the overlap, something which Ogle has done multiple times already in an Iron shirt.

    #242659
    FerriteFerrite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 102

    Let me throw another name into the mix without lessening the blame on Boyce and Taft. Could Dewhurst have claimed the ball before the opposition players for the first two?
    Both well inside the 6 yard box.

    I wondered that too but will give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

    #242664
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 91

    I’ve never understood the “O’Malley is good going forwards” comment

    He’s assisted 2 goals hasn’t he via his crosses ?. If a player is a good runner with the ball and he’s a good, accurate crosser, It means they’re good at going forwards.

    There is a real player in there. I just think with what he offers he’d be more comfortable further forward and Daniel maybe the safer bet with his experience at LB.

    #242671
    Lord KitchenerLord Kitchener
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 36

    I didn’t see the match, just listened to the commentary. But there was apparently two moments where (I think Boyce) left the ball expecting the goalie to come out of his area to collect it.

    Was he hoping to start a run and be fed the ball from just outside the area, or was he just being lazy?

    #242675
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 91

    I didn’t see the match, just listened to the commentary. But there was apparently two moments where (I think Boyce) left the ball expecting the goalie to come out of his area to collect it.

    If the GK is in close proximity fair enough expect him to come out and clear the ball but Dewhurst wasn’t so I don’t know why Boyce didn’t take responsibility and just clear the ball.

    I much rather like the see defenders just banging out of play if needed..especially an experienced head like Boyce.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #242679
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 100

    Nuttall header. He seemed to climb high, defy gravity and hang in the air for half a second. That is an ability which really could bring us goals from set pieces. First time I’ve seen him do it.
    Hadn’t really understood the commentator when he said that we were twice caught between O’ Malley and Taft. Now having seen the highlights …

    #242681
    Everytime refereePat O’Cake
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 17

    But there was apparently two moments where (I think Boyce) left the ball expecting the goalie to come out of his area to collect it.

    When I played centre back (admittedly a very long time ago and not a particularly high standard) I was always told if the keeper doesn’t shout for it you deal with it, I would never leave a ball if I hadn’t had a shout.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.