Why miss out that Lammy met with Palestinian leaders too?
I thought the argument for Saint Jeremy meeting the IRA was that he was convincing them to commit to peace. Yet when the foreign secretary does it, and meets with Palestinians (plus with reiterating ceasefire calls), it’s apparently becoming friends with Netanyahu. The job is to meet with leaders for a foreign secretary, including rotten ones. He’s not some backbencher on a jolly.
Oh I see ,You now agree that Corbyn was right? Glad you came around,sorry I pointed out the hypocrisy of those who made that argument about Corbyn.Ps Kier has backslided on the criminal charges against the mass murderer hasn’t he?
No, Corbyn was never foreign secretary. He was a backbencher who only met with a side he agreed with, Lammy is foreign secretary, so obviously has to meet with foreign leaders and did with both sides.
It’d be hypocritical if I criticised Corbyn for meeting with dodgy groups as foreign secretary, so I assume you have evidence of that.
I thought you were against him cosying up to war criminals. He met with the Palestinian authority, which negates your earlier insinuation that he was cosying up to Netanyahu. It was clearly to meet representatives of Israel and Palestine.
You appear to be avoiding while trying to twist my words the fact that Kier Starmer has backslid on criminal charges for a war criminal your best mate and mate of the Kremlin Netty Yahoo.
Lammy and Starmer are not peace makers they’re there to placate someone they support, you cannot pretend to be looking for peace while backing genocide and ethnic cleansing from one side .They continue to allow UK weapons to be used to kill murder and maim innocents in refuge camps ,you too support this vile army
I have not twisted words. You said Lammy wanted to meet with a war criminal, suggesting you’re against that. I pointed out meeting with Hamas would be bad for that reason, because when pointed out that Lammy wasn’t meeting him to buddy up and met with others you tried to shoehorn them in. Lammy was so against peace he called for a ceasefire, while Corbyn did nothing for peace and supported the wrong uns. You can tell, because he never met anyone on the side, working with the nasty people there, showing where he had bias.
Aye, I am focussed on one side only, which is why I think IDF and Hamas have issues in this war, while you only seem tunnel visioned on one, despite this. If only I was like you and saw it in a ‘balanced’ way so I knew that Hamas members burying ammunition in safe areas was the fault of the IDF. I think a situation where the IDF can be blamed for having to reevacuate and inadequate evacuations and Hamas for using civilians as shields. Yet the ‘balanced’ ones see better and know that Hamas can do whatever they want because they never get criticism.
Now I can see why you rarely get past posting provocations 64. It’s gonna take you some time and effort to understand Sidey’s reasoned case. I hope you make it.
.
