- This topic has 54 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by
.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Non football is for business discussions
1 user thanked author for this post.
i use quite a few different forums some business some pleasure and the Bru purely cos i love SUFC
On every forum ive noticed there are members who are best avoided … see there username and just dont click on their all too predictable contributions.. its not burying my head in the sand, or the fact the members posts may be true accurate or false its just an agenda forms which rightly or wrongly gradually turns very tedious for members not wishing to hear this wash rinse repeat cycle.
IB …IMO you are firmly in this category and your constant posting purely to discredit DH via his past companies should as suggested (and you asked) be best placed in the NON football section thus giving members like myself who dont think your contributions are not helping the club in any way the option not to see your posts mingled in with football chat.
UTI
1 user thanked author for this post.
IB you should post it off to TCNY, he’s an experienced journalist and will put you right on whether your new information could be libellous if posted on this forum or not, don’t forget to mention an earlier post you had removed which may have also crossed the legal line.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hi IB,
I can’t speak to any moderator’s decisions, but if it’s information relevant to the ownership, stadium, or anything else to do with the club’s ongoing situation, I’d welcome the opportunity to review it and further research from there. It’ll be in safe and useful hands.
You can email it to me: JordanZakarin@gmail.com. As a journalist, I have no horse in the race, so to speak, and only want to see Iron fans supporting a sustainable club with honest ownership.
Hi Jordan,
I did post the information on the forum yesterday afternoon but it appears to have been deleted by the moderators, unfortunately.
When you start deleting information which is readily available in the public domain, as I demonstrated in my post, it sets a dangerous precedent because people will consider you to be part of the problem, rightly or wrongly. As I said to a few people last week, it doesn’t really come as a surprise to me, especially after reading SST’s post on 11/07/23 regarding his conversation with Hilton. Furthermore, there is nothing in the way of consistency when it comes to the moderating of the site. I could direct the moderators to a contributor on here who is throwing surnames about left, right, and centre with absolutely no supporting evidence and his/her posts remain live.
I rather get the distinct impression that the moderators are keen to establish what I know, they just don’t appear to be so keen for it to be known by their members.
As always, I will remain respectful of their site. It’s their site and they can moderate it as they see fit.
1 user thanked author for this post.
My huge tattoo of DH cost me that today.
It must have been on your head
2 users thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.