- This topic has 57 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by
.
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
Oops, beaten by 13 minutes. scrub that then………….
1 user thanked author for this post.
Remember though: there’s no gland in Glanford!
Not now Sherbert is banned, no.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Great news and shows what can be done when you have a decent owner and board with our interests at heart. No petty excuses about ransom strips and no victim narratives to distract.
5 users thanked author for this post.
Remember though: there’s no gland in Glanford!
Not now Sherbert is banned, no.
Is he actually banned?
Hopefully so; Dark times when our only form of communication was through his Facebook rants alongside Wham
1 user thanked author for this post.
Remember though: there’s no gland in Glanford!
Not now Sherbert is banned, no.
Is he actually banned?
Hopefully so; Dark times when our only form of communication was through his Facebook rants alongside Wham
He was more than an unwitting conduit, he was stirring the pot good and proper.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I spoke to Paul Hurrell on the subject of Herbert the other week.
He told me he had been told to keep away from GP for his own safety.
Apparently, there’s members on the Facebook forum not happy with him.He shouldn’t be ‘told to keep away from GP for his own safety’… He should be banned from GP for good. Launching a mobile phone would be the legitimate reason – but then bragging constantly about it on social media and also stirring up division in the ways that he did was appalling. The guy is a liability to the reputation of the club.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Isn’t that the moron who decided it was a good idea to throw Aidan McCartney’s phone on the pitch because he dared to say something about Hilton ?
I don’t know why the club don’t just slap him with a permanent ban !
No good will come of him hanging around like a bad smell.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes. Not forgetting all that business trying to obtain supporters addresses via social media – not least those who have raised thousands for club wages whilst acting as a mouthpiece for the person who refused to pay the wages and who’s has left the club in such a financially perilous place (amongst many other things).
2 users thanked author for this post.
Officially…… Yes he is banned.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.