- This topic has 58 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 1 day, 13 hours ago by
.
-
Some rum old combinations there :)
1 user thanked author for this post.
Reactionary – but, better late than never.
Credit to them.Agreed. Rather than cynicism and slagging it off, it should be viewed as a massive opportunity for the supporters. Whoever does it is going to have to have a very strong stomach for it though, as they’ll get ripped to shreds whatever they do.
4 users thanked author for this post.
If we’ve got the joke answers out of the way then surely the Trust has the best opportunity to canvas the opinions of over 1000 supporters so a rep. from there would seem appropriate. ( Dons tin helmet and ducks)
2 users thanked author for this post.
Seems rushed and a token gesture. Must do better.
1 user thanked author for this post.
All breeds of not trusting the trust to talk to.
If the club could be just be arsed to read the objectives of the trust they would see they’re the right group of fans to talk to, their the ones on the corner every game for fans to get or put input in who else engages with fans on a regular basis.What is up with my club when they can’t even get the simple things right.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Fans64, BadApple,1500club
1 user thanked author for this post.
Fans64, BadApple,1500club
The Golden Age of Bru.
2 users thanked author for this post.
If we’ve got the joke answers out of the way then surely the Trust has the best opportunity to canvas the opinions of over 1000 supporters so a rep. from there would seem appropriate. ( Dons tin helmet and ducks)
If they valued the Trust why do this? They could get reps from most of the fans groups in a regular meeting to achieve the same outcome, whilst not setting up 3 individuals for a sure fire beating as soon as something like ‘FCgate’ occurs.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.