- This topic has 258 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 6 months ago by
.
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Club Stooges (as many as we can find) with approved questions
Christ on a bike, the guy cannot win!!! He must really be wondering what he has walked into here with some of you lot!
2 users thanked author for this post.
I thought the football was as low as we could go but the close season on here is just a frigging shite show. Behave yourselves the lot of ya.
3 users thanked author for this post.
No room for attempts at humour any more then?
Not much to write about at the moment is there?2 users thanked author for this post.
Club Stooges (as many as we can find) with approved questions
Christ on a bike, the guy cannot win!!! He must really be wondering what he has walked into here with some of you lot!
That’s a bit rich from a poster who frequently reminds everyone that he had Swann’s number ‘from day one’. So when others respond critically to Hilton you’re all over them? Do me a favour.
That was based on evidence of Trinity supporters who told us what Swann was like, also anyone with a brain cell could see the way we were throwing money around was only going to end in disaster!
As for Hilton, yes I’m willing to give him the benefit of doubt and time to sort out the mess Swann left behind until he does something to change my opinion, that’s all I can do, lets not forget, Swann took a club over in a far better position to what Hilton did.
4 users thanked author for this post.
If anyone’s turning in to another Bucks, it appears to be you and numerous others who don’t seem able to accept anyone being critical of Hilton.
I’ll accept people being critical of Hilton when he has done something to be critical of, at the moment the poor sod can’t do right for wrong!
5 users thanked author for this post.
I think the timing of the forum (ie pre 24/5 and not after) is a point worthy of discussion.
Don’t think we should be chanting “are you Swanny in disguise?” just yet!
2 users thanked author for this post.
Well done on the responses to mine. Much better than basically telling people to behave, pipedown or shut up, basically, because you don’t like to see it. And Les, yes there is ‘a big distinction between considered criticism and rushing to criticise’ but that’s not happened in this case. Most criticism has been based on some particular actions which are well rehearsed on here and have split opinion. To suggest people have rushed to criticise is rewriting recent history somewhat and quite patronising tbh.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The only rehashing in this thread is from Hilton acolytes basically telling critics to shut up. ‘Hey ho carry on’? Yeah, as long as you don’t say a bad word about the saviour eh? Some of the abuse and insults posters have received on here for just airing opinion about Hilton has been shameful tbh. So I make no apologies for posting my views to the latest round of attempted silencing and derision.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Don’t agree DM so hey ho.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.