‘Michelle has taken us as far as she can. Michelle has suggested this herself already.’
No she hasn’t. She brought in a CEO to help with the workload and is welcoming new investment. Very different to her saying she’s taken us as far as she can, but if 2+2=5 it’s fair game I suppose.
Two new investors are neither use nor ornament unless they put their money in as donations instead of loans, and they’re hardly likely to do that when others are loaning.
And that’s taking for granted that board members are prepared to dilute their shareholding (the 4 of them own 80% of shares)
Hostile takeover needed imo.
‘Michelle has taken us as far as she can. Michelle has suggested this herself already.’
No she hasn’t. She brought in a CEO to help with the workload and is welcoming new investment. Very different to her saying she’s taken us as far as she can, but if 2+2=5 it’s fair game I suppose.
“She” didn’t bring him in!
A power play following a recommendation from our fishy friends. Great start he’s had too.
Thought she said in a Humberside interview ‘we’ve created…’, or words to that effect, so I assumed the role was her idea, or a Board decision, at least, regardless of the person appointed?
.
