Iron Bru › Forums › Blast Furnace › Colchester Away
- This topic has 38 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 1 month ago by lesgeo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2021 at 8:44 pm #216762
This manager brings nothing to the table,Neil just go. One CB got a sore knee the other CB got two sore knees. Jai Rowe is fit but on the bench you can’t make it up. Time to go fan knee.
3 users thanked author for this post.
October 30, 2021 at 8:46 pm #216763Coxes excuse on Humberside was that “he was worried prior to the match, because one or two of the players looked a bit slow during midweek training”, what a bloody clown he is, but after saying that maybe the 2,000 remaining paying supporters are bigger clowns for still turning out to support hs rubbish, and possibly going a long way in keeping him in a job.
October 31, 2021 at 7:56 pm #216818Why do we wait until we are two goals behind before we decide to attack, pathetic
I’ve always said the same. Cox sets the team up so conservatively that we always concede ground and goals.
Cox will only go more adventurous usually when it’s too late. No excuse, second half when we were more positive we had the upper hand…. they weren’t even a good side.
Also if Cox thought they were going with 2 up top, why the hell didn’t he quickly change it as 3 CB’s and sometimes wing backs were marking space all around Sears when only he was ever really running into.
Never seen anything so bloody stupid. Cox should have took Davis off who was complete shite again and either stick Beestin in central midfield to bulk it up or put Jarvis on in the no 10 role because to be fair to him he has got a good touch on him.
Also, Why did Cox include O’Neil on the bench in expense of Hallam ?
I don’t quite understand that personally. I thought he looked good upfront with Loft against Donny, is pretty good in no 10 role and can do a job in CM and is better in all those positions than O’neil is as a striker.
I don’t get the thought process as we already had Jarvis on the bench, who is again better than O’Neil.
1 user thanked author for this post.
October 31, 2021 at 8:11 pm #216823I don’t know why you bother trying to break games down anymore wondergoals.
Our tactics can be summed up by watching videos on the opposition, having a good week in training and sticking 5 at the back.
The Crawley win has almost hindered us because it’s bought Cox another month in the job.
4 users thanked author for this post.
October 31, 2021 at 8:13 pm #216824Picking half fit ‘favourites’ before fully fit others is no way to manage a squad, how can this help morale?
Hallam crocked again? Must be or he’d surely be in the squad, more great communication from the club.2 users thanked author for this post.
October 31, 2021 at 8:35 pm #216832I think Hallam is fit Cassidy. I could be wrong but wasn’t he in full training last week ?
“I don’t know why you bother trying to break games down anymore wondergoals”.
I like a moan, especially when it’s warranted..a huge part of that is highlighting the utter incompetence.
I know people have eyes and will already know but it makes me feel better venting it !
It was comical though seeing Davis, Manny and Taft all marking Sears.
What made it even more daft was due to them 3 playing too deep Thompson and Millen were sometimes tracking back as well to cover mostly 1 player and there was only Sears along with their winger who ran into the area all 5 were marking and still let two goals in lol
3 users thanked author for this post.
November 1, 2021 at 9:53 am #216853I think Hallam is fit Cassidy. I could be wrong but wasn’t he in full training last week ?
Makes Cox’s selection look even worse then if he’s fit and not in the squad.
1 user thanked author for this post.
November 1, 2021 at 10:43 am #216855Swanny said Hallam was out again at the last meeting
1 user thanked author for this post.
November 1, 2021 at 11:04 am #216858Presumably he had to have another medical before getting the extended contract.
If not – why not?
If yes – perhaps the club should be looking out for a different doc.
Indeed – maybe that is something which should have been looked at several years ago, n’est-ce pas? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.