- This topic has 40 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Backs to the wall 1-0 win.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Not great football but a great shift put in by the whole team.
Feed the Beest.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Well that was some game, talk about Robin Hood, they dominated the first hour, but failed to take their many chances, we had ONE SHOT all game and came away with a win!!!
My ratings for tonights match being:-
HOWARD—8—Made saves when required, but his kicking found touch 70% of the time.
BROWN—6—Did ok and defended well.
KARACAN8—8—My MOM today, passed very well and good position all game.
McGAHEY—-7–Did his job, without being his usual outstanding self, but ok.
clarke—3—hE HAD A TERRIBLE GAME, POOR PASSING, CAUGHT IN POS
BEEDTIN—-5—-Not involved in much tonight, abcent for long spells.
GREEN—4—Did very little, never got involved, why select him???
BEDEAU—4—Caught in posession too many times, poor passing, getting worse.
GILLIEAD—7—Played well without being his normal self, difficult game for midfielders.
EISA—3—Never beat his man, dribbled into their players and lost the ball many times, and over hit crosses every time, how can a player go off so much???
KVV—7—Very difficult up front with yourself, but took his one chance very well.REF–9—A first class performance by him, did not react to dives, kept play going.
COX—5—Usual 45 mins defending all first half, one shot on target all 99 minutes, poor team selections with Rowe and O’Malley on the bench, Rowe should have starte instead of Clarke, and O’Malley should have started instead of Green. Very valuable but luckey three points, but Cambridge only had themselves to blame, good to see Howard have a good game, but his kicking should be handy when he turns to Rugby League for a couple of years before retiring. I think Onarise instead of Bedeau would vastly improve the team when fit.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Absolute rubbish Stampy, those marks where my asswssment for todays match, ok you are over the moon at the Scunny performance, but they were very, very luckey to take the points, and could (but where not) been 4-0 down at half time.
I agree what you say regarding it being a very, very, very good result and three very, very good points, but your comments are 100% based on the result, a few of the player were crap, Clarke, Green, Bedeau and Eisa if you need names, but as I have said many times, THESE ARE MY RATINGS and you have your own views, why don’t you submit your ratings and we will see wghat you think, but if we had lost 3-1 I feel sure your assessment would be completely differend, yes we had ONE SHOT ON TARGET IN 100 minutes, not that brilliant is it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
We were away from home against top of the league. The team that have scored the 3rd most goals this season and we kept a clean sheet. That doesn’t happen if 2 of your defenders are poor and the other 2 are average. Your numbers are nonsense.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The manager gets a 5 rating and the after a 1-0 win against top Of the league away from home !?!
at least the Cambridge commentators seemed to appreciate the effort even if some our fans don’t.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.