Bax Mellend

[Deereyme66]

Tony Wilson used to get called a t*** all the time. He was smart enough to use it to his advantage though.

[Apollo11]

64 wrote:

Notice he’s not said which comments his objects to,

I expect he just objects to being objected to.

[Ferrite]

64 wrote:

Notice he’s not said which comments his objects to,

Notice he hasn’t said anything about the abuse he was hurling at the referee at Spennymoor, that was picked up on the TV coverage.

[Awaywego]

Bloody hell he’s not one of those fans who actually goes to games is he.

[MK Iron]

In his defence I very rarely hurl abuse at referees but I felt compelled to make an exception at Spennymoor.

[Siderite]

64 wrote:

Notice he’s not said which comments his objects to,

He seems to have objected to yours. He seems to conflate negative things said about him with abuse.

[Apollo11]

He seems to conflate negative things said about him with abuse.

That’s because he’s an angry middle-aged man endorsed by a supposedly impartial podcast.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Bishops Finger

[Deereyme66]

This forum. Is. A DISGRACE! Has he been taking lessons off Liz Truss?

[Apollo11]

One thing that this particular thread has smoked out is Me-Boy’s willingness to mislead or to try and manoeuvre his way out of any accountability.

His defensive claim (on Twitter) that he assisted with the dossier which contributed to Hilton’s downfall has rightly been called out by those who actually were involved in it.

That lie, rather than anything else, is the key issue now – because it’s an absolute whopper.

[Siderite]

I am not astounded he’d be fast and loose with the truth, but I am surprised that he thought he could fool people with something so obviously dubious. At the end he was saying how “Hilton was mostly good.” All while he was supposedly spearheading a dossier documenting Hilton’s problems.

Don’t forget that he’s also making out that he is a fair figure who came to bat for the Matts after their banning orders. While omitting that he made caveats in that defence about how they were in talks with the Swanns, which always was an attempt to discredit them and Bru. Hardly the fair figure he is now trying to portray himself as.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Apollo11

[Apollo11]

Siderite wrote:

I am not astounded he’d be fast and loose with the truth, but I am surprised that he thought he could fool people with something so obviously dubious. At the end he was saying how “Hilton was mostly good.” All while he was supposedly spearheading a dossier documenting Hilton’s problems.

Don’t forget that he’s also making out that he is a fair figure who came to bat for the Matts after their banning orders. While omitting that he made caveats in that defence about how they were in talks with the Swanns, which always was an attempt to discredit them and Bru. Hardly the fair figure he is now trying to portray himself as.

Seems to have been one of those people who thinks he’s the smartest in the room, but has been found out on multiple occasions?

[Iron-awe]

Apollo11 wrote:

Siderite wrote:

I am not astounded he’d be fast and loose with the truth, but I am surprised that he thought he could fool people with something so obviously dubious. At the end he was saying how “Hilton was mostly good.” All while he was supposedly spearheading a dossier documenting Hilton’s problems.

Don’t forget that he’s also making out that he is a fair figure who came to bat for the Matts after their banning orders. While omitting that he made caveats in that defence about how they were in talks with the Swanns, which always was an attempt to discredit them and Bru. Hardly the fair figure he is now trying to portray himself as.

Seems to have been one of those people who thinks he’s the smartest in the room, but has been found out on multiple occasions?

Is he to the fans equivalent to Simon Elliott to the board?

[ironfromafar]

Been busy a few days and off the radar …i do hope my earlier post hasnt ruffled any ginger feathers.
Tend to tar most politicians withe the same brush as the large majority are lying scheming thieves who for the most part are out to feather their own nest rather than doing what they were voted in for.
Must admit other than the recent watchalong Alfreton v Boston i dont partake in the podcasts as find them a tad ladish .. I do however really like Gareths IRONARMY match days vlogs subscibed n watch every week.

uti

[Bishops Finger]

The iron bru podcast is worth a listen to if you want some iron related chatter without the smut.

[ironfromafar]

Bishops Finger wrote:

The iron bru podcast is worth a listen to if you want some iron related chatter without the smut.

Good call Bish , checked out the last IronBru podcast and was impressed with its informative less banterous style

[Author]

Posts