- This topic has 82 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
-
Do you check the CCJ site daily?
Good point AA, come on Andy have you a site monitoring fetish 🤔
Do you check the CCJ site daily?
Good point AA, come on Andy have you a site monitoring fetish 🤔
Have you got empirical evidence that IBs real name is Andy, or shall we just wait and see?
Do you check the CCJ site daily?
Good point AA, come on Andy have you a site monitoring fetish
I couldn’t confirm he was called Andy before but given my comment has been deleted, that confirms it is to me.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Just what club is that I know who I support have grave doubts about you
Read that three times now and still can’t make head nor tail of it
This is Prat O’ Fakes new best friend and source of misinformation that claims I only attended one game last season.
Info that is completely false, I’m baffled by his agenda, no doubt he’ll find a new target to attempt to discredit when he realises his new best friend is as barmy as he is.I think you seriously need help, I know two people on this board (OHI isn’t one of them as far as I am aware) that I know of and one of them is you Mr Malt Shovel which is why I know for a fact you only attended one game last season, only attending one game is not a problem of course unless you are pretending to be in the know about the club like you are, the irony of calling me fake is laughable, I DO attend games and I don’t try making out I am privvy to information, I base my opinions on facts and what I know which is why I am backing Mr Hilton until I have a reason not to.
As for agenda’s the only one I have is calling out bullshitters like you that sit in the pub mouthing off about things you know nothing about.I spoke to SNOT at glanford park before a number of games last season, I am not a liar! FACT.
1 user thanked author for this post.
There are so many red flags around the club at the moment that I would rather focus on this. Yet situations confirmed by Hilton, governmental authority (CCJs) and worries over ground issues are dismissed as mad rumours. I don’t think Hilton would confirm a supporter cap if it was a rumour, nor would legal proceedings go through on rumours; you’re not getting a CCJ because someone spreads a rumour about owed costs.
Do some of those who oppose Hilton have agendas against him? Very likely. However, I don’t see how that nullifies worries, including those which have been raised by them. It would be like focussing on the journalist’s background and ignoring any issues raised about the government, while supporting the government and saying we should be thankful for them. The agenda or background of the journalist does nothing to show the government’s alleged greatness or contradict claims raised by the journalist.
Lest it needed be said, I don’t want us to be in a bad position, but I think we have very worrying signs that we are, and not all because of Swann’s legacy. I’d be overjoyed to be proven wrong, but until the ground issues, CCJs, wage/redundancy payment and supporter cap issues get sorted or properly explained without any room for doubt, I cannot let go of such worries. Rubbishing them and pleeing to ignore them does not remove worries. Some people speak as if these issues wouldn’t exist if people didn’t come on to mention them. That would just make it more likely for us to be blissfully unaware. I’d rather know than not know and potentially be confused and distraught later on.
As for rumours, when is that state of the art training pitch being unveiled?
2 users thanked author for this post.
Do you check the CCJ site daily?
Good point AA, come on Andy have you a site monitoring fetish
Have you got empirical evidence that IBs real name is Andy, or shall we just wait and see?
Dawsons post being removed is evidence enough for me. I think people just want context as to why he has such an intrest in David Hilton so much so he frequents this forum more than your average Scunny fan.
I wouldn’t bother trying to convince him or anyone else. You knew you were there, so does Brassy, and I suspect numerous others. Just deflection from the bigger concerns that some can’t deal with being confronted with in La La Land.
1 user thanked author for this post.
So are you on the Southend forum posting about their owner or not Andy, straightforward enough question, it’s either yes or no?, don’t be shy now you aren’t usually.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.