Registered On: December 24, 2013
Re correlation, BRI, if I were quoting you I’d have used quote marks. What your comment is saying is that there is no correlation; and, indeed, there isn’t. Not least for the reasons you’ve outlined.
Otherwise I’m afraid you’re the one highlighting your own ignorance. All you’ve done is say what you always do, which is that there’s evidence of global warming due to the greenhouse effect. I’ve never denied this and never will because that is a fact. Nobody is claiming otherwise.
What you seem unable to accept is that it’s climate ‘scientists’ who are the ones claiming they can model the climate and predict what’s going to happen in the future to absurd levels of accuracy, not me. They can’t and you know it.
So I repeat for the umpteenth time: where is the hard evidence, the hard data to support what I can only assume is your view that the world is facing a problem due to MAN-MADE global warming, climate change or anything else you want to call it? The 100% truth is that this only exists in computer models, which is an indisputable fact.
You then proceed to attack me for asking what any proper scientist should be asking — and many are asking it, btw — because of my ego?! You even talk about “the majority of scientists” because you know full well that many scientists do not agree with the claims being made. This in itself reveals just how ridiculous climate ‘science’ has become. Science isn’t settled by a “majority” vote but by hard data and what the data actually reveals is that the problem is nothing like as bad as being claimed.
Yet, once again, apparently, I’m the one talking bollocks.