Like I mentioned earlier, I don’t think the current strict liability interpretation of the laws is good for the game BUT the players should know what’s what & deal with it. Everyone else has to.
Well I don’t keep up with the laws if that is the rule then maybe that’s the problem not the refs. If the ref has correctly applied the laws of the game in the Taft situation that is baffling and needs to be looked at.
How can anyone in charge of the game watch that and believe it is the correct outcome?
